neurofoo/rice
RICE prioritization scoring initiatives by Reach, Impact, Confidence, and Effort. Use for feature prioritization, roadmap planning, or when comparing initiatives objectively.
npx skills add https://github.com/neurofoo/agent-skills --skill rice
Score and rank initiatives using Reach, Impact, Confidence, and Effort to make prioritization decisions more objective.
For each initiative, estimate the four RICE factors, calculate the score, and rank them. Be explicit about assumptions behind each estimate.
Context
What are we prioritizing? What's the time horizon for Reach?
Factor Definitions
Scoring Table
| Initiative | Reach | Impact | Confidence | Effort | RICE Score |
|------------|-------|--------|------------|--------|------------|
| [Name A] | [#] | [0.25-3] | [%] | [#] | [calculated] |
| [Name B] | [#] | [0.25-3] | [%] | [#] | [calculated] |
| [Name C] | [#] | [0.25-3] | [%] | [#] | [calculated] |
Ranked Results
Detailed Breakdown
For each initiative:
Sensitivity Analysis
Which scores would change significantly if assumptions are wrong?
Recommendation
Based on the scores and analysis:
> [What to prioritize and why, including any caveats]
What RICE Doesn't Capture
Impact Scale
| Score | Meaning |
|-------|---------|
| 3 | Massive — core value prop |
| 2 | High — significant improvement |
| 1 | Medium — noticeable improvement |
| 0.5 | Low — minor enhancement |
| 0.25 | Minimal — nice to have |
Confidence Scale
| Score | Meaning |
|-------|---------|
| 100% | High — have data |
| 80% | Medium — reasonable estimate |
| 50% | Low — mostly guessing |
$ARGUMENTS
Take neurofoo/rice from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.