Plan Alm

> Plugin check: Run node "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/check-version.js" — if it outputs a message, show it to the user before proceeding.

plan-alm

A 4-phase planner that gathers ALM strategy from the user, generates an HTML deployment plan, and gets approval. It does not execute anything — execution is delegated to the individual ALM skills, which the user runs afterward.

Overview

This skill detects the current project state (existing solution, pipeline), asks targeted questions about the desired promotion strategy (Power Platform Pipelines or Manual export/import), generates a visual docs/alm-plan.html, and gets user approval. The four phases are: Phase 1 — Detect, Phase 2 — Gather strategy, Phase 3 — Generate plan, Phase 4 — Approve & save.

plan-alm never deploys. The plan's steps[] array records the recommended execution sequence. After approval, the user invokes the individual skills — setup-solution, setup-pipeline (or export-solution), and deploy-pipeline (or import-solution) — in that order. Each of those skills detects the approved plan via its Phase 0 gate, proceeds without re-nagging, and refreshes the plan on completion. This separation is deliberate: it keeps plan-alm safe to run unattended (e.g. under autopilot) because no single answer can trigger an irreversible deployment.

Do NOT create tasks at the start — strategy is unknown until Phase 2 completes. Create both tasks in Phase 3 once the strategy is determined.

Phase 1 — Detect Project State

Do NOT create tasks yet. Use natural language progress reporting only during this phase.

Steps:

• Detect prior ALM deferral for this project. Before any discovery work, check whether the project root contains a .alm-deferred marker file. The marker is written by users who explicitly opted ALM-skill validators out of "missing artifacts" warnings (e.g. *"this site is handled separately"* or *"ni-dev — no ALM"*). If a user is now invoking plan-alm, we should surface that the marker is present and ask what to do, rather than silently proceeding (which would build a plan the user previously decided not to maintain) or silently removing the marker (which would re-enable nags on every other ALM skill).

   node "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/check-alm-plan.js" --projectRoot "." --no-heartbeat

> Use --no-heartbeat here: this is a read-only deferral check by the *planner*, not an execution-skill Phase 0 gate. Without it, check-alm-plan.js would promote an already-Approved plan to In Execution (and refresh the heartbeat) just because you re-opened plan-alm — but re-planning isn't execution. Execution skills call it *without* --no-heartbeat so the first one to run does the Approved → In Execution promotion.

<!-- gate: plan-alm:1.deferral | category=progress | cancel-leaves=deferral-marker -->

> 🚦 Gate (progress · plan-alm:1.deferral): .alm-deferred marker present — continue and remove, continue and keep marker, or cancel. Determines whether downstream ALM skills resume gate enforcement.

The helper returns { deferred, deferral, ... }. If deferred === true, read the deferral reason (deferral.reason or the raw marker text) and ask via AskUserQuestion:

> "This project has an .alm-deferred marker — {reason}. ALM was previously deferred here, so the other ALM skills (setup-solution, setup-pipeline, deploy-pipeline, …) skip their plan-completeness checks for this project. How would you like to proceed?"

| Question | Header | Options |

|---|---|---|

| How would you like to proceed? | ALM deferral marker | Continue planning and remove the marker (Recommended), Continue planning but keep the marker (record deferral context in plan), Cancel |

• Continue and remove marker (Recommended) → delete .alm-deferred (the user is re-engaging with ALM). Set DEFERRAL_CLEARED = true and proceed to step 1.
• Continue and keep marker → set DEFERRAL_PRESERVED = true and DEFERRAL_REASON = {reason}. Proceed to step 1. Surface a one-line note in the Phase 1 step 9 user report (e.g. *"Note: .alm-deferred is preserved — other ALM skills will continue to skip plan-completeness checks for this project."*) so the user remembers the marker remains in effect after planning.
• Cancel → exit cleanly (don't touch the marker).

If deferred === false, skip this step silently and proceed to step 0b.

0b. Offer to approve an existing Draft in place (skip re-planning). The same check-alm-plan.js output from step 0 also carries exists and planStatus. When exists === true and planStatus === "Draft", the user already has a saved Draft plan — offer to approve it directly instead of regenerating the whole plan. (This is the only Draft→Approved path; without it, approving a draft means a full re-plan.)

<!-- gate: plan-alm:1.approve-draft | category=plan | cancel-leaves=nothing -->

> 🚦 Gate (plan · plan-alm:1.approve-draft): An existing Draft plan was found — approve it in place (no re-plan), re-plan from scratch, or cancel. Approving here writes the status via set-plan-status.js and exits without re-running discovery; no deployment is triggered.

Ask via AskUserQuestion:

> "This site already has an ALM plan saved as Draft (docs/alm-plan.html). What would you like to do?"

| Question | Header | Options |

|---|---|---|

| What would you like to do? | Existing draft plan | Approve this draft now — no re-plan (Recommended), Re-plan from scratch, Cancel |

• Approve this draft now (Recommended) → capture the approver using the Phase 4 approver-capture procedure (the always-interactive prompt with git/OS-name prefill), then write the status atomically with the helper:

     node "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/set-plan-status.js" --projectRoot "." --status Approved --approver "{APPROVER}" --render

Commit (git add docs/alm-plan.html docs/.alm-plan-data.json && git commit -m "Approve ALM plan for {siteName}"), run skill tracking (Phase 4 finalize), print the Phase 4 next-steps guidance, and exit. Do not continue to step 1 — there is nothing to re-plan.

• Re-plan from scratch → proceed to step 1 (the rest of Phase 1 regenerates the plan; Phase 4 saves the new version).
• Cancel → exit cleanly (leave the Draft as-is).

If exists === false, or planStatus is anything other than "Draft" (Approved / In Execution / Completed / null), skip this step silently and proceed to step 1.

• Resolve the site identity from the local project. .powerpages-site/website.yml is the source of truth for websiteRecordId and siteName, and it is present for both Power Pages site types:
• Code / SPA sites — scaffolded by /power-pages:create-site and downloaded with pac pages download-code-site. These also have a powerpages.config.json and SPA source (src/, build output in dist//build/).
• Data-model sites (standard and enhanced data model / "EDM") — downloaded with pac pages download --modelVersion 1|2. These have no powerpages.config.json; instead .powerpages-site/ holds the config tree (web-pages/, web-templates/, content-snippets/, …) plus a .powerpages-site/.portalconfig/ manifest pair. There is no local build output.

Resolution order (first match wins):

• .powerpages-site/website.yml (preferred, present for every downloaded/deployed site) — read with the Read tool and extract:
• id field → websiteRecordId
• name field → siteName (the file uses short keys; it is name:, not adx_name:)
• powerpages.config.json (fallback — code/SPA sites only; used during plugin development from this repo root or for sites scaffolded but not yet deployed) — read siteName and websiteRecordId.

Determine SITE_TYPE (recorded in planData as siteType and used to skip SPA-only assumptions below; it is a data field in docs/.alm-plan-data.json, not rendered in the HTML):

• declarative when .powerpages-site/.portalconfig/ exists, or .powerpages-site/website.yml resolved while no powerpages.config.json is present. (This value was formerly data-model; plans written before the rename may still carry data-model, which is equivalent.)
• code when powerpages.config.json is present.

If neither marker is found, stop with:

> "No Power Pages site found in the current directory. Run this skill from your site project root — that's where .powerpages-site/ lives after pac pages download-code-site (code/SPA site) or pac pages download --modelVersion 2 (enhanced data-model site). If you haven't created the site yet, run /power-pages:create-site first."

environmentUrl is always re-confirmed from pac env who in step 4 — it does not need to come from either source.

• Check for .solution-manifest.json in the project root:
• Store SOLUTION_DONE = true if found, false otherwise
• If found, read solution.uniqueName and store as SOLUTION_UNIQUE_NAME

• Check for docs/alm/last-pipeline.json in the project root:
• Store PIPELINE_DONE = true if found, false otherwise
• If found, read pipelineName and stages[] for later use

• Run silently:

   pac env who

Capture the environment URL and display name. Store as DEV_ENV_URL and DEV_ENV_NAME. The URL label varies by PAC version: current PAC (2.8.x) prints it under Org URL:; older builds used Environment URL: — read whichever is present (there is no Environment URL: line on 2.8.x, so do not look only for that label). The display name is the Friendly Name: / Connected to... value. If you can't parse it reliably, leave DEV_ENV_URL empty — Step 6's verify-alm-prerequisites.js resolves the authoritative URL from pac env who via the shared getEnvironmentUrl() helper (which matches both labels) and returns it as .envUrl.

• Run silently:

   node "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/list-environments.js"

Store the JSON array as ENV_LIST for pre-filling environment URLs in Phase 2. (This helper parses pac env list; the old pac env list --output json is invalid on current PAC CLI — pac env list only accepts --filter — so the helper exists to produce the JSON the table form doesn't. It prints [] and exits 0 if PAC is unauthenticated, so pre-fill simply degrades to manual entry.) Each entry is { displayName, environmentId, environmentUrl, uniqueName, active }.

• Acquire dev environment token (silently):

   node "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/verify-alm-prerequisites.js" --envUrl "{DEV_ENV_URL}"

Store .token as DEV_TOKEN and .userId as userId.

Track plan quality. Initialize a PLAN_QUALITY accumulator to "complete" at the start of Phase 1. If this token acquisition fails (auth error), set DEV_TOKEN = null, set PLAN_QUALITY = "degraded", and record the cause (e.g. *"dev-environment auth failed — contents/size/host discovery skipped"*) — then continue. Contents discovery is skipped gracefully, but the resulting plan is built on partial inputs; Phase 3 surfaces this as a prominent risk so the user reviews before executing. (There is no execute path to block here — plan-alm only plans — but a degraded plan must be visibly flagged.)

6b. Environment-match guard — confirm pac env who points at the project's environment *before* running discovery. DEV_ENV_URL comes from whatever environment PAC happens to be connected to, which is not guaranteed to be the project's. If it isn't, every query in Steps 7–12 runs against the wrong environment and silently produces a degraded plan (zero or wrong site settings, wrong size, wrong host) that *looks* valid. Cross-check both signals available:

• Recorded-URL comparison (no token needed): collect any environment URL the project already records — powerpages.config.json → top-level environmentUrl (code/SPA sites; absent for declarative/EDM sites) and .solution-manifest.json → top-level environmentUrl if present. Normalize by origin (lowercase host, drop trailing slash + path/query). If any recorded URL exists and its origin differs from DEV_ENV_URL's origin → mismatch.
• Site-existence probe (covers declarative/EDM sites that record no URL; only when DEV_TOKEN is available): verify the site's websiteRecordId actually exists in the connected env:

       GET {DEV_ENV_URL}/api/data/v9.2/powerpagesites({websiteRecordId})?$select=powerpagesiteid
       Authorization: Bearer {DEV_TOKEN}

A 404 (or empty result) means the connected environment does not contain this site → mismatch. (Skip this probe when DEV_TOKEN = null — Step 6 already degraded the plan; don't double-prompt.)

If neither signal indicates a mismatch, continue silently to Step 7 — do not prompt. Only prompt on a detected mismatch:

<!-- gate: plan-alm:1.env-match | category=progress | cancel-leaves=nothing -->

> 🚦 Gate (progress · plan-alm:1.env-match): PAC CLI is connected to an environment that does not match the project's. Switch and re-run, or continue against the connected env (degraded plan).

Ask via AskUserQuestion:

| Question | Header | Options |

|---|---|---|

| PAC CLI is connected to {DEV_ENV_NAME} ({DEV_ENV_URL}), which does not match this project's configured environment ({recorded URL, or "this site was not found there"}). Discovery will run against the connected environment. How do you want to proceed? | Env Mismatch | Switch PAC env & re-run (Recommended), Continue against {DEV_ENV_NAME} anyway |

Exactly two outcomes (both halt-or-proceed; no separate "cancel" — "Switch & re-run" already stops the skill):

• Switch PAC env & re-run (Recommended): stop the skill. Tell the user to point PAC at the right environment (pac auth select --name <profile> or pac org select --environment <url>) and re-run /power-pages:plan-alm. Nothing has been written.
• Continue against {DEV_ENV_NAME} anyway: proceed to Step 7 against DEV_ENV_URL, but set PLAN_QUALITY = "degraded" and record the cause (*"discovery ran against {DEV_ENV_NAME}, which may not be the project's environment — verify the plan's site settings / size / host before executing"*) so Phase 3 surfaces it as a prominent risk.

> Why this exists: a real EDM-site run produced a valid-looking plan after PAC had silently stayed connected to a different env than the project targeted. The site-existence probe + recorded-URL comparison catch that at the earliest gate, before any discovery runs.

• Discover and classify site settings (if DEV_TOKEN is available and websiteRecordId is known):

Use Node.js https module to query. Paginate via @odata.nextLink — sites with > 500 settings would otherwise silently truncate, dropping tier classifications and underreporting plannedEnvVarCount. Send Prefer: odata.maxpagesize=5000 so Dataverse emits the continuation link, then loop until exhausted:

   GET {DEV_ENV_URL}/api/data/v9.2/mspp_sitesettings?$filter=_mspp_websiteid_value eq '{websiteRecordId}'&$select=mspp_name,mspp_value&$top=5000
   Authorization: Bearer {DEV_TOKEN}
   Prefer: odata.maxpagesize=5000
   OData-MaxVersion: 4.0
   OData-Version: 4.0
   Accept: application/json

On each response, append value[] to the running array. If @odata.nextLink is present, GET that URL with the same headers (no need to re-add the filter — the nextLink already encodes the query). Stop when the response has no @odata.nextLink. Cap at 100 iterations for safety.

Classify the returned settings using ${PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/classify-site-settings.js — the single source of truth for the credential regex and tier mapping shared with setup-solution Phase 5. Either pipe the JSON array of {name, value} rows into the script's stdin (CLI mode) or require() it inline:

   echo '<JSON array of {name,value}>' \
     | node "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/classify-site-settings.js"

Output (the four-bucket shape that downstream phases + setup-solution consume directly):

   SITE_SETTINGS_DATA = {
     keepAsIs: [{name}],                          // regular settings (Tier 3 — Search/Bootstrap/WebApi/feature flags)
     authNoValue: [{name}],                       // Authentication/* or AzureAD/* with empty value (Tier 2b — added as-is, set in target env)
     promoteToEnvVar: [{name, value}],            // Authentication/* or AzureAD/* with value (Tier 2a — setup-solution offers env-var promotion)
     credentialNeedsDecision: [{name, value}]     // ConsumerKey/ConsumerSecret/ClientId/ClientSecret/AppSecret/AppKey/ApiKey/Password (Tier 1 — bulk-with-override prompt in setup-solution Phase 5.4.C)
   }

Tier semantics in plain English (so reviewers reading the plan know what each bucket implies):

• Tier 1 (credentialNeedsDecision) — credential-style names. Setup-solution Phase 5.4.C runs a single bulk prompt: auto-classify by name (Secret-typed env var for *Secret/*Password/*ApiKey/*AppKey; String-typed for *Id/*ConsumerKey), all-as-Secret, all-as-String, skip-all, or pick-per-credential.
• Tier 2a (promoteToEnvVar) — auth config with a dev value. Setup-solution Phase 5.4.A asks which to back with env vars so each stage can use different values.
• Tier 2b (authNoValue) — auth config with no dev value yet. Added to the solution as-is; user sets the value in each target env after deployment.
• Tier 3 (keepAsIs) — everything else. Added unchanged.

If the OData query fails or the helper errors out, set SITE_SETTINGS_DATA = null and continue — the plan still renders, it just can't break down site settings by tier.

• Build SOLUTION_CONTENTS_DATA:

   {
     tables: solutionManifest?.components?.tables || [],     // from .solution-manifest.json if SOLUTION_DONE
     botComponents: solutionManifest?.botComponents || [],   // from manifest if available
     siteSettings: SITE_SETTINGS_DATA                        // from step 7, or null
   }

If SOLUTION_DONE = false and manifest is absent, tables and botComponents will be empty arrays — the plan will show a note that they will be discovered during setup-solution.

• Report to user:

   Found: **{siteName}** on `{devEnvUrl}`.
   Solution: {✓ already set up ({solutionUniqueName}) / ✗ not yet}.
   Pipeline: {✓ already set up ({pipelineName}) / ✗ not yet}.
   Site settings: {N total — K regular (keep as-is), P auth settings to review for env var, A auth settings (no dev value), C credential-style settings (setup-solution will prompt per credential) / unable to query}.

10. Estimate solution size and evaluate the split decision tree. First ensure the ALM artifacts directory exists (all .alm-* and last-* artifacts live under docs/alm/ to keep the project root uncluttered):

    node -e "require('fs').mkdirSync('docs/alm',{recursive:true})"

Run the estimate helper to classify the site across size, component count, schema heaviness, web file aggregate, and env var count. Use the tmp-file write pattern — if the estimator fails, a prior good docs/alm/alm-size-estimate.json is preserved instead of being overwritten with an empty/partial file. When SOLUTION_DONE = true (a .solution-manifest.json exists), pass --solutionId {solutionId} so the env var count is scoped to the target solution — without it, the estimator falls back to a publisher-prefix tenant-wide query and overcounts whenever the prefix is shared across projects (the common new_ / cr5fe_ regression):

    node "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/estimate-solution-size.js" \
      --envUrl "{DEV_ENV_URL}" --websiteRecordId "{websiteRecordId}" \
      --publisherPrefix "{publisherPrefix}" --siteName "{siteName}" \
      {if SOLUTION_DONE: --solutionId "{solutionManifest.solution.solutionId}"} \
      --projectRoot "." --siteType "{SITE_TYPE}" \
      --datamodelManifest "./.datamodel-manifest.json" > ./docs/alm/alm-size-estimate.json.tmp \
      && mv ./docs/alm/alm-size-estimate.json.tmp ./docs/alm/alm-size-estimate.json

When SOLUTION_DONE = false, omit --solutionId; the estimator's output will include envVarCountScope: "publisher-prefix" to signal the wider scope, and the renderer surfaces this caveat in the Env Variables tab so reviewers know the number reflects the tenant view, not a specific solution. --projectRoot "." enables the disk cross-check — the estimator walks the local build output (dist/, public-output/, build/, .output/) and surfaces webFilesDiskMeasuredMB. When that number is much larger than the Dataverse-measured webFilesAggregateMB, the estimator flips truncationSuspected: true with a warning — file-typed columns whose bytes aren't returned by $select=content are the usual cause and the plan should trust the disk number.

> SITE_TYPE = "declarative" (EDM/standard data-model) sites have no build output, so the disk cross-check finds no dist//build/ directory and webFilesDiskMeasuredMB stays null — this is expected, not a problem. Web files for declarative sites live as records under .powerpages-site/web-files/ and are measured via the Dataverse query, so the size estimate is still valid; there's simply no SPA bundle on disk to cross-check against. Pass --projectRoot "." regardless — it's a harmless no-op for these sites.

Then run the decision tree (same tmp-file pattern):

    node "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/compute-split-plan.js" \
      --estimate ./docs/alm/alm-size-estimate.json \
      --projectRoot "." \
      --siteName "{siteName}" \
      --publisherPrefix "{publisherPrefix}" > ./docs/alm/alm-split-plan.json.tmp \
      && mv ./docs/alm/alm-split-plan.json.tmp ./docs/alm/alm-split-plan.json

If either command exits non-zero, stop and report the stderr message to the user. Do not proceed to Q1b in Phase 2 without a valid split plan.

Store the output as SPLIT_PLAN. Fields to read: splitStrategy, proposedSolutions[], appliedStrategies[], assetAdvisory, sizeAnalysis, recommendations[].

If SPLIT_PLAN.proposedSolutions.length > 1, set RECOMMEND_SPLIT = true. Otherwise false.

Report to the user:

    Estimated size: {totalSizeMB} MB — components: {count} — tier: {overall tier}.
    Tables: {tableCount} — scoped to the site's table permissions ({tableCountScope}).
    Decision tree result: {splitStrategy} → {N} solutions recommended.
    Asset advisory: {K} files flagged for Azure Blob externalization.

> Table count is site-referenced, not publisher-prefix. The estimator scopes custom tables to the tables the site actually references (its table permissions + datamodel manifest), so a shared/default publisher (new_) no longer inflates the count. tableCountScope reports how it was scoped: site-referenced (table permissions), manifest-only, or unavailable (no local .powerpages-site/ signal — table count is 0, never an env-wide dump). When unavailable, note that the table-based split signal was skipped. The estimate command already passes --projectRoot ".", which supplies the local table permissions.

10b. Enumerate environment variable definitions (runs whenever DEV_TOKEN is available — the size estimator gives a count but not per-variable metadata).

The renderer's Env Variables tab needs schema name, type, default value, and bound site setting per definition. Without this step, the tab can only show a count-summary note while the size signal and the warning quote a number — three views that don't fully agree. Running this query produces the row-level data so the table renders properly.

Pass --solutionId when SOLUTION_DONE = true so the returned envVars[] is scoped to the target solution. The helper paginates correctly (Prefer: odata.maxpagesize + @odata.nextLink) regardless of scope — the difference is just which env vars are returned.

    node "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/discover-env-var-definitions.js" \
      --envUrl "{DEV_ENV_URL}" --token "{DEV_TOKEN}" \
      --publisherPrefix "{publisherPrefix}" \
      --websiteRecordId "{websiteRecordId}" \
      {if SOLUTION_DONE: --solutionId "{solutionManifest.solution.solutionId}"} > ./docs/alm/alm-env-vars.json.tmp \
      && mv ./docs/alm/alm-env-vars.json.tmp ./docs/alm/alm-env-vars.json

Read the JSON: { envVars: [{ schemaName, type, defaultValue, siteSetting }], count, scope }. The scope field is 'solution' when --solutionId was passed and the solution had env var defs, 'publisher-prefix' otherwise, 'none' when the helper short-circuited (no prefix or auth lapse). Store envVars as ENV_VARS_DETAILS and scope as ENV_VARS_SCOPE for use when building planData.envVars in Phase 3 (pass through unchanged).

The helper degrades gracefully (returns { envVars: [], count: 0, scope: 'none' }) when the publisher prefix is unknown, the token has expired, or the query errors. In those cases the renderer falls back to the size estimator's count via sizeAnalysis.envVarCount.value (commit 8cbc39a) — ENV_VARS_DETAILS = [] is acceptable.

> Why scoping matters here: without --solutionId, the helper filters env var defs by publisher prefix tenant-wide. For tenants with a generic prefix (new_, cr5fe_), this returns env vars from unrelated projects and inflates the count + the envVars[] table the renderer draws. The plan looks correct ("12 env vars detected") but is actually showing rows from someone else's project. With --solutionId, the helper intersects against solutioncomponents.componenttype=380 for the target solution — only env vars actually owned by the plan's solution.

Skip rule: if DEV_TOKEN is null (auth was unavailable in step 6), skip this step and set ENV_VARS_DETAILS = []. The renderer's count-summary fallback covers this case.

11. Pre-plan completeness check (only runs when SOLUTION_DONE = true).

Before the user approves a plan, verify the existing solution already covers everything on the live site. Components created after the last /power-pages:setup-solution run (server logic from add-server-logic, flows from add-cloud-flow, env vars from configure-env-variables or setup-auth) are silently excluded from any plan built on top of a stale solution.

Run the shared discovery helper against the source environment:

    node "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/discover-site-components.js" \
      --envUrl "{envUrl}" --token "{token}" \
      --siteId "{websiteRecordId from powerpages.config.json}" \
      --publisherPrefix "{solutionManifest.publisher.prefix}" \
      --solutionId "{solutionManifest.solution.solutionId}" \
      --projectRoot "."

Parse stdout and evaluate missing.*:

• All missing.* arrays empty → report "Solution contents match the site — proceeding with fresh plan inputs." Continue to Phase 2.
• Any non-empty missing.* array → report a compact summary:

> "Your solution is missing {N} component(s) that exist on the site:

>

> - {X} site components (e.g. {first 3 names})

> - {L} site languages (powerpagesitelanguage — required; without these the target site silently fails to render post-auth)

> - {Y} cloud flows

> - {Z} environment variable definitions

> - {W} custom tables

>

> A plan built now will ignore these components. How would you like to proceed?"

Always render the site languages line when missing.siteLanguages.length > 0, even when other categories are zero — this gap was a recurring silent-failure mode before discover-site-components started enumerating powerpagesitelanguages. See references/solution-api-patterns.md for the 3-entity model.

<!-- gate: plan-alm:1.completeness | category=progress | cancel-leaves=nothing -->

> 🚦 Gate (progress · plan-alm:1.completeness): Completeness check found gaps vs live site. Sync first, plan with gaps recorded, or cancel.

Ask via AskUserQuestion:

| Question | Header | Options |

|---|---|---|

| Run /power-pages:setup-solution in sync mode to adopt the missing components before planning? | Completeness Check | Yes — sync first (Recommended), No — plan with current solution contents, Cancel |

• Yes, sync first (Recommended): invoke /power-pages:setup-solution (auto-detects the existing manifest and enters sync mode). After it completes, re-run the discovery helper; if missing.* is now empty proceed to Phase 2, otherwise repeat the prompt.
• No, plan with current contents: store the gap summary as KNOWN_GAPS so Phase 3 can surface it in the plan HTML's Risks section, then continue.
• Cancel: stop the skill so the user can investigate.

> Why this exists: the same check runs at export (export-solution Phase 2.5) and deploy (deploy-pipeline Phase 3.5). Adding it here catches gaps at the earliest possible gate — before the user invests time reviewing a plan built on stale inputs. See AGENTS.md → ALM-aware by default.

> Skip when SOLUTION_DONE = false: if there is no manifest yet, there is nothing to be stale against — Phase 2 Q1 will handle first-time solution setup.

12. Run host resolution (PP Pipelines path only — runs after the completeness check).

Skip rule: if PIPELINE_DONE = true, skip this step entirely — the host info comes from docs/alm/last-pipeline.json. Only fresh-pipeline projects need resolution.

Acquire a BAP-audience access token (the BAP API uses a different audience than Dataverse):

    az account get-access-token --resource "https://service.powerapps.com/" --query accessToken -o tsv

Capture the output as BAP_TOKEN. If acquisition fails, set HOST_RESOLUTION = { status: 'DetectionFailed', error: '<stderr>' } and skip the detect call.

Run the detect-only wrapper. Use the same tmp-file-then-mv pattern as Phase 1 step 10 so a prior good docs/alm/alm-host-resolution.json is preserved if the script fails mid-write. Pass --skus Production,Sandbox,Trial so trial-license and developer tenants see their eligible envs in the env-first menu (the helper's default is Production,Sandbox; we widen to include Trial here because plan-alm's NoHost branch always offers an existing-env install path that Trial envs can take, even though Trial envs cannot use the create-new fast-path):

    node "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/ensure-pipelines-host-detect.js" \
      --envUrl "{DEV_ENV_URL}" --token "{DEV_TOKEN}" --userId "{userId}" \
      --bapToken "{BAP_TOKEN}" \
      --projectRoot "." \
      --cacheMaxAgeHours 24 \
      --skus Production,Sandbox,Trial > ./docs/alm/alm-host-resolution.json.tmp \
      && mv ./docs/alm/alm-host-resolution.json.tmp ./docs/alm/alm-host-resolution.json

> Note: ensure-pipelines-host-detect.js is a detection-only wrapper the ensure-pipelines-host skill exposes for orchestrators. It runs Phases 1.0 (cache fast-path) + 2 (resolution order including tenant-wide enumeration) + 5 (verify if a host is found) of that workflow, but never enters Phase 3 (decision tree) or Phase 4 (provisioning). Output matches the docs/alm/last-host-check.json schemaVersion 2 with actionTaken: "none" always.

Failure handling: if the detection script exits non-zero, set HOST_RESOLUTION = { status: 'DetectionFailed', error: '<stderr>' } and continue. Phase 2 Q4 falls back to today's "enter URL manually" branch.

On success, parse docs/alm/alm-host-resolution.json and store as HOST_RESOLUTION (mapping the wrapper's field names into the plan-alm shape):

    HOST_RESOLUTION = {
      status: parsed.resolutionStatus,                  // one of: AvailableUsingCustomHost | AvailableUsingCustomHostByAdminDefault | AvailableUsingPlatformHost | AvailableUnboundCustomHost | MultipleUnboundCustomHosts | PlatformHostExistsUnbound | CannotRedirect | NoHost | OrgSettingStale | PermissionDenied
      finalHostEnvUrl: parsed.finalHostEnvUrl,          // string | null
      finalHostEnvId: parsed.finalHostEnvId,            // string | null
      hostType: parsed.isPlatformHost ? 'platform' : (parsed.finalHostEnvUrl ? 'custom' : null),
      pipelinesSolutionVersion: parsed.pipelinesSolutionVersion,  // string | null
      candidates: parsed.candidates                     // { existingCustomHosts[], existingPlatformHost, eligibleForAppInstall[], inaccessibleEnvs[] }
    }

Report a single line:

    Pipeline host: {finalHostEnvUrl} ({status})

or, when no URL is set yet:

    Pipeline host: will be ensured during setup-pipeline ({status})

Phase 2 — Gather ALM Strategy

Ask questions in sequence. Solution is always Q1 — it is the prerequisite for all other steps. Branch after Q2 based on promotion strategy selection.

Log every major decision. As each decision is made below (Q1 solution, Q1b split/override, Q2 strategy, Q3 stages/targets, Q4 host, Q5 approval mode, Q5 manual export type), append to a DECISIONS_LOG array: { field, value, source } where source = "default" when the recommended/auto value was accepted without an active change, or "explicit" when the user picked a non-default option. Phase 4 renders a "Decisions defaulted (please review)" section from this log so a reviewer can see at a glance which choices were defaults vs. deliberate picks (closes the *"I never agreed to managed export"* gap). This adds no new prompts — it only records what the existing prompts produced.

Q1 — Solution Setup (always asked first)

If SOLUTION_DONE = true (manifest found in Phase 1):

<!-- gate: plan-alm:2.q1-existing | category=plan | cancel-leaves=nothing -->

> 🚦 Gate (plan · plan-alm:2.q1-existing): Existing solution found — reuse it (skip setup-solution) or create new (run setup-solution).

Ask via AskUserQuestion:

> "A Dataverse solution is already configured for this site: {SOLUTION_UNIQUE_NAME}. Use this existing solution?"

Options:

• Yes, use the existing solution — setup-solution will be skipped in the plan
• No, create a new solution — set SOLUTION_DONE = false; setup-solution will run

If SOLUTION_DONE = false (no manifest found):

Tell the user (not via AskUserQuestion — informational only):

> "No Dataverse solution is set up for this site yet. setup-solution will be the first step in your plan. The publisher prefix you choose during setup is irreversible — choose carefully."

<!-- gate: plan-alm:2.q1-fresh | category=plan | cancel-leaves=nothing -->

> 🚦 Gate (plan · plan-alm:2.q1-fresh): No existing solution — include setup-solution in plan, or accept a user-supplied unique name.

Ask via AskUserQuestion:

> "Ready to include solution setup in the plan?"

Options:

• Yes, include solution setup — continue
• I already have a solution (enter name) — accept free-text solution unique name, set SOLUTION_DONE = true, SOLUTION_UNIQUE_NAME = user input

Q1b — Split Recommendation (only if RECOMMEND_SPLIT = true)

<!-- gate: plan-alm:2.q1b-split | category=plan | cancel-leaves=nothing -->

> 🚦 Gate (plan · plan-alm:2.q1b-split): Follow recommended split strategy, override to single, accept Asset Advisory first, or show migration guidance.

The decision tree from Phase 1 Step 10 recommended splitting into multiple solutions. Ask via AskUserQuestion:

> "Based on the site size and component analysis, the recommended approach is {splitStrategy} — {N} solutions instead of one. Do you want to follow this recommendation?"

Options:

• Use the recommended split — proceed with proposedSolutions[] from the decision tree. setup-solution will create all N solutions.
• Keep as a single solution anyway — override to single. Record override reason; setup-solution creates one solution with all components.
• Accept Asset Advisory first (only offered if assetAdvisory.candidates.length > 0) — user commits to externalizing the flagged assets. Recompute size excluding those files, re-run the decision tree, present the new recommendation.
• Show me migration guidance (only offered if an existing .solution-manifest.json is found and does not match the recommendation) — produce docs/alm-migration-plan.md and exit. Do not execute.

If option 1: continue with proposedSolutions.

If option 2 — Keep as a single solution anyway: this overrides a data-driven recommendation that's frequently right. Before honoring the override, re-surface the tier signals so the user is making an informed choice, not a one-click dismissal. Read from SPLIT_PLAN.sizeAnalysis:

   You're about to override a {splitStrategy} recommendation. Before doing that, here's what the estimator measured:

   • Total size:           {totalSizeMB.value} MB   (tier: {totalSizeMB.tier} — threshold {thresholds.maxSolutionSizeMB} MB)
   • Component count:      {componentCount.value}   (tier: {componentCount.tier} — threshold {thresholds.maxComponentCount})
   • Schema attributes:    {schemaAttrCount.value}  (tier: {schemaAttrCount.tier} — threshold {thresholds.maxSchemaAttrs})
   • Web files aggregate:  {webFilesAggregateMB.value} MB  (tier: {webFilesAggregateMB.tier} — threshold {thresholds.maxAggregateWebFilesMB} MB)
   • Env var definitions:  {envVarCount.value}      (tier: {envVarCount.tier})

   {if SPLIT_PLAN.truncationSuspected === true:
     ⚠ The estimator flagged its inputs as possibly truncated:
       {SPLIT_PLAN.truncationWarnings.join('\n       ')}
     The numbers above could be UNDER-counted. Investigate before overriding.
   }

   Solutions exceeding the platform thresholds frequently fail to import (timeouts, OOM, partial state). A single-solution plan that lands in the red tier is the most common cause of "the deploy hung overnight" reports. Recovering means splitting after the fact, which is harder than splitting upfront.

<!-- gate: plan-alm:2.q1b-override | category=consent | cancel-leaves=nothing -->

> 🚦 Gate (consent · plan-alm:2.q1b-override): Override the data-driven split recommendation to keep as single solution. Free-text overrideReason follows on Yes.

Then ask via AskUserQuestion:

| Question | Header | Options |

|---|---|---|

| Still want to keep as a single solution? | Override confirmation | No — use the recommended {splitStrategy} split (Recommended), Yes — override anyway and note the reason, Cancel — re-think the strategy |

• No → re-route to Option 1 (use the recommended split).
• Yes → require a free-text overrideReason via a follow-up AskUserQuestion ("Briefly: why is single-solution the right call for this site?"). Record overrideReason and overrideConfirmedSignals (the tier-classified signals shown above) in the plan. Only then override SPLIT_PLAN.proposedSolutions to the single-solution structure for rendering.
• Cancel → return to Q1b top.

> Why the friction: in field-reported sessions, "keep as single anyway" was a one-click override and turned out to be the single most common path to a wrong recommendation. The re-confirmation isn't there to talk the user out of it — it's there to make sure the override is informed and the reason gets recorded for audit. Override-with-recorded-reason is fully respected; the gate only blocks the silent click-through.

If option 3: subtract advisory candidate sizes from the estimate, re-run compute-split-plan.js, re-present.

If option 4: write docs/alm-migration-plan.md (see the spec doc solution-splitting-logic.md §7), commit it, mark plan as Deferred, exit.

Q2 — Strategy Selection (always asked)

<!-- gate: plan-alm:2.q2-strategy | category=plan | cancel-leaves=nothing -->

> 🚦 Gate (plan · plan-alm:2.q2-strategy): Pick promotion strategy — PP Pipelines (Recommended), manual export/import, existing pipeline, or help-me-decide. Branches the rest of the plan.

Recommendation prelude (shown inline in the prompt body). Before listing the options, surface the recommendation and any state that affects it, so the user sees it up front instead of having to drill into option 4:

> Recommendation: Power Platform Pipelines for ongoing CI/CD — automated promotion, approval gates, and deployment history in one place. Manual export/import is intended for one-off migrations only; repeating it for every change loses the audit trail and silently allows version-skew bugs.

>

> *(Conditional, append when HOST_RESOLUTION.resolutionStatus ∈ {AvailableUsingCustomHost, AvailableUsingCustomHostByAdminDefault, AvailableUsingPlatformHost, AvailableUnboundCustomHost}):*

> A pipelines host already exists in your tenant at {HOST_RESOLUTION.finalHostEnvUrl} (Pipelines v{HOST_RESOLUTION.pipelinesSolutionVersion}). PP Pipelines requires no new infrastructure for this project.

Ask via AskUserQuestion:

> "How do you want to promote your solution between environments?"

Options:

• Power Platform Pipelines (Recommended for ongoing CI/CD) — Microsoft's native CI/CD, managed deployments, approval gates
• Manual export/import (one-off migrations only) — export a zip from dev and import directly to each target environment
• I already have a pipeline set up — run a deployment now
• Help me decide — show the full comparison again

Record the pick in DECISIONS_LOG ({ field: "strategy", value, source }).

If option 4 selected: Re-print the recommendation prelude above, then re-ask Q2 with only options 1–3.

If option 3 selected: Read docs/alm/last-pipeline.json, confirm pipeline name and stages, then skip to Phase 3 (generate plan) with strategy = pp-pipelines, PIPELINE_DONE = true.

PP Pipelines Path — Q3 through Q6

<!-- gate: plan-alm:2.q3-stages | category=plan | cancel-leaves=nothing -->

> 🚦 Gate (plan · plan-alm:2.q3-stages): Pick how many deployment stages — Staging only / +Production / Production directly / Custom.

Q3: Ask via AskUserQuestion:

> "How many deployment stages do you want in this pipeline?"

Options:

• Staging only — Dev → Staging (I'll add Production later)
• Staging + Production — Dev → Staging → Production (full promotion chain)
• Production directly — Dev → Production only (bypass staging)
• Custom — I'll describe my own stage layout

If option 4: accept free-text description (via "Other") and build a stage list from the response.

Store stages as PP_STAGES (array of { label, envUrl, envName, type }). Dev is always the source.

For each stage, populate envName from ENV_LIST (gathered in Phase 1 Step 5 via list-environments.js). Match by URL origin (lowercase, trailing slash stripped, path/query ignored) against each entry's environmentUrl and copy the entry's displayName into envName. When no match is found — usually because the user pasted a custom URL via "Other" — leave envName unset; the renderer falls back to showing the URL alone in the stage card. The renderer puts envName between the stage label and the URL (e.g. *Staging / Supplier Portal Staging / https://orgd6a9894f.crm5.dynamics.com/*) so reviewers recognize the env at a glance and the URL stays available as a one-click jump-to-env. Set type: "source" for the dev/source stage and type: "target" for every downstream stage so the renderer applies the active-stage styling correctly.

<!-- not-a-gate: informational reconciliation note; surfaces a soft warning but creates no decision/prompt -->

Reconcile the chosen stages against an existing pipeline (soft warning, PP path). When PIPELINE_DONE = true (a docs/alm/last-pipeline.json exists), compare each chosen target stage in PP_STAGES against that file's stages[] (match by targetEnvironmentUrl origin, then by stage name). For every chosen target that has no matching stage on the existing pipeline, record a { type: "warning" } entry for the plan's Risks section: *"Chosen target '{label}' ({envUrl}) has no matching stage on the existing pipeline '{pipelineName}' — setup-pipeline will need to add it."* This catches the real mismatch where a saved plan says *Dev → Production directly* but the live pipeline only has a single *Deploy to Staging* stage. It is informational only — do not block or re-prompt; the user can still approve the plan, and setup-pipeline reconciles the actual stages at execution time.

<!-- gate: plan-alm:2.q4-host | category=plan | cancel-leaves=nothing -->

> 🚦 Gate (plan · plan-alm:2.q4-host): Host environment selection — branches on HOST_RESOLUTION.status and surfaces the right menu (use-detected / pick from list / NoHost host-type / Sandbox confirm / CannotRedirect block / manual paste). Drives HOST_ENV_URL and WILL_PROVISION_* flags for the rest of plan-alm and ensure-pipelines-host. Uses AskUserQuestion per branch.

>

> Trigger: Phase 2 Q4 entry; HOST_RESOLUTION populated in Phase 1 step 12.

> Why we ask: Auto-picking a host can provision a new Custom Host (WILL_PROVISION_CUSTOM) consuming an Azure capacity quota the user didn't intend; or pick the wrong env, sending pipelines through a foreign host. The downstream ensure-pipelines-host skill TRUSTS this answer and skips its own 3.C menu.

> Cancel leaves: Nothing — no provisioning fired yet.

Q4 (host environment — branches on HOST_RESOLUTION.status from Phase 1 step 12):

This question consumes HOST_RESOLUTION populated by the new detect-only wrapper run in Phase 1 step 12. Each branch sets HOST_ENV_URL (which feeds the rest of plan-alm) and may also set the auxiliary flags CHOSEN_ENV_URL, WILL_PROVISION_PLATFORM, WILL_PROVISION_CUSTOM, WILL_USE_PPAC, WILL_ENSURE_HOST, and USER_CHOSE_DEFER_TO_SETUP_PIPELINE. Defaults: HOST_ENV_URL = HOST_RESOLUTION.finalHostEnvUrl, all flags false / null.

Why the NoHost branch presents the env-first menu here instead of deferring to ensure-pipelines-host Phase 3.C: the original design asked a yes/no "we'll provision new — continue?" question in plan-alm and let 3.C surface the env-first choice at execution time. In practice the agent treated the plan-alm yes-confirmation as authorization to skip 3.C entirely (or to skip 4.A's pre-call gate), and users hit 4.A → 409 trial-license errors when an existing env install (4.B) would have been a clean path. Surfacing the env-first menu here — once, at planning time, when the user has full context — eliminates the ambiguity. ensure-pipelines-host then trusts CHOSEN_ENV_URL and skips its own 3.C menu (see ensure-pipelines-host Phase 3 skip rule).

| status | Q4 prompt | Result |

|---|---|---|

| AvailableUsingCustomHost, AvailableUsingCustomHostByAdminDefault, AvailableUsingPlatformHost | "Detected host {finalHostEnvUrl} (Pipelines v{pipelinesSolutionVersion}). Use this host?" Options: 1. Yes, use this / 2. Use a different host environment (Other) | Y → HOST_ENV_URL = HOST_RESOLUTION.finalHostEnvUrl. N → fall back to today's "enter different URL" branch (free-text via Other). |

| AvailableUnboundCustomHost | "Existing Custom Host {displayName} ({finalHostEnvUrl}) found in tenant — not yet bound to dev env. setup-pipeline will reuse it (recommended; avoids duplicates). Use this host?" Options: 1. Yes, use this / 2. Use a different host environment (Other) | Y → HOST_ENV_URL = HOST_RESOLUTION.finalHostEnvUrl, WILL_ENSURE_HOST = true. N → fall back to "enter different URL". |

| MultipleUnboundCustomHosts | "{N} Custom Hosts found in tenant. Which one should setup-pipeline use?" Options: enumerate HOST_RESOLUTION.candidates.existingCustomHosts[] (up to 3) by display name + URL, plus "Other" for a custom URL, plus "Decide later — setup-pipeline will ask". | Picked candidate → HOST_ENV_URL = candidate.instanceApiUrl, WILL_ENSURE_HOST = true. Decide-later → HOST_ENV_URL = null, WILL_ENSURE_HOST = true, USER_CHOSE_DEFER_TO_SETUP_PIPELINE = true. |

| PlatformHostExistsUnbound | "Tenant Platform Host {finalHostEnvUrl} exists. Use it (no admin role required) or create a new Custom Host?" Options: 1. Use Platform Host / 2. Create new Custom Host / 3. Cancel | 1 → HOST_ENV_URL = HOST_RESOLUTION.finalHostEnvUrl, WILL_ENSURE_HOST = true. 2 → HOST_ENV_URL = null, WILL_PROVISION_CUSTOM = true, WILL_ENSURE_HOST = true. 3 → exit. |

| NoHost | Host-type prompt — same shape as ensure-pipelines-host Phase 3.C so the user makes the host choice once, here, instead of being asked again at execution time. Present: *"No Pipelines host bound to {devEnvUrl}. Which environment should host Pipelines? Pipelines lives in one env per tenant; pipelines, stages, and run history are stored there. Source envs deploy through it."* Top-level options: 1. "Provision a Platform Host (recommended) — Microsoft-managed Dataverse env auto-provisioned in your tenant home geo. Pipelines app pre-installed. Idempotent. ~3–5 min." 2. "Set up a Custom Host — Pipelines lives in a Dataverse env you control. We'll ask whether to use an existing env or create a brand-new dedicated one." 3. "Open PPAC and create one manually (admin fallback)." 4. "Switch to Manual export/import strategy." 5. "Cancel." When the user picks Option 2, surface the Custom-Host sub-prompt: build the eligible-env list from HOST_RESOLUTION.candidates.eligibleForAppInstall[] with role labels (dev env, source env, staging env, production env) per origin match; cap the visible list at 5 envs with role-aware ranking (see "Eligible-env presentation cap" below). Sub-options: a. Each visible env (display name + URL + role labels) labeled "*Install Pipelines app on this env*" — sandbox-sku envs add a "(Sandbox — confirmation gate)" suffix; append "Other (paste URL)" as the last per-env entry. b. "Create a brand-new dedicated env (D365_ProjectHost template, ~5–10 min, requires Power Platform admin)." c. "Back — return to host-type menu." When the eligible list is empty, drop sub-option a and present only b / c. | Option 1 (Platform Host) → HOST_ENV_URL = null, WILL_PROVISION_PLATFORM = true, WILL_ENSURE_HOST = true. Option 2 → sub-prompt; sub-option a picked env → HOST_ENV_URL = picked.instanceApiUrl, CHOSEN_ENV_URL = picked.instanceApiUrl, WILL_ENSURE_HOST = true (Sandbox confirmation gate, if applicable, must be passed before this resolution stands; "Other (paste URL)" → ask for the env URL via free-text, then proceed as a picked eligible env); sub-option b → HOST_ENV_URL = null, WILL_PROVISION_CUSTOM = true, WILL_ENSURE_HOST = true; sub-option c → re-show top-level menu. Option 3 (PPAC) → HOST_ENV_URL = null, WILL_USE_PPAC = true, WILL_ENSURE_HOST = true. Option 4 (Manual strategy) → restart Phase 2 with STRATEGY = manual. Option 5 → exit. |

| CannotRedirect | Block. Show the org-setting vs tenant-default mismatch error from HOST_RESOLUTION.candidates/warnings and stop the skill — only a Power Platform admin can resolve. | Exit with the specific error. |

| OrgSettingStale, PermissionDenied, DetectionFailed | Surface the error; ask the user to enter the host URL manually with pac env list pre-fill (today's fallback). Pre-fill options from ENV_LIST (up to 3 known environment URLs) plus "Other" for a custom URL; pre-fill first option from docs/alm/last-pipeline.json if present. | HOST_ENV_URL = user-supplied. |

Store the resulting HOST_ENV_URL for use by the rest of plan-alm. The auxiliary flags CHOSEN_ENV_URL, WILL_PROVISION_PLATFORM, WILL_PROVISION_CUSTOM, WILL_USE_PPAC, WILL_ENSURE_HOST, and USER_CHOSE_DEFER_TO_SETUP_PIPELINE feed the planData hostResolution block in Phase 3 and the inline summary in Phase 4. ensure-pipelines-host reads chosenEnvUrl, willProvisionPlatform, willProvisionCustom, and willUsePpac from that block to bypass its own Phase 3.C menu when the user has already made the choice here.

Eligible-env presentation cap (used by the NoHost row above and by MultipleUnboundCustomHosts). When the eligible list runs long, build the visible options as follows so the prompt stays scannable:

• Always-visible role-labeled envs first. Include any eligible env carrying a dev env, source env, staging env, or production env label (matched by URL origin against devEnvUrl and against PP_STAGES[].envUrl). These are the project's own envs and are nearly always the right pick. Dedupe by origin.
• Fill remaining slots up to 5 from the rest of the eligible list, in the order returned by list-tenant-envs.js (name-hint pattern pipeline|deploy|host|alm|cicd|govern → admin-perms → recency).
• Append "Other (paste URL)" as the last per-env entry inside option 1's nested list — escape hatch for envs that didn't make the cap.
• When eligible.length > 5, suffix option 1's headline with: Showing top 5 of {N}; the remaining {N-5} eligible env(s) can be reached via the "Other (paste URL)" entry. When eligible.length <= 5, no suffix (all envs visible inline).
• When the user picks "Other (paste URL)", pre-fill the URL input with ENV_LIST (the list-environments.js output gathered in Phase 1 — each entry's environmentUrl) so they can paste-or-pick from the full inventory rather than typing a URL by hand.

The same cap policy applies to ensure-pipelines-host Phase 3.C — see that skill's Step 3a for the same rules. Keep the two implementations consistent so users see the same prompt shape regardless of whether they enter via plan-alm or directly via setup-pipeline → ensure-pipelines-host.

<!-- gate: plan-alm:2.q5-approval | category=plan | cancel-leaves=nothing -->

> 🚦 Gate (plan · plan-alm:2.q5-approval): Pick approval mode — required per stage / staging auto + prod required / no gates.

Q5: Ask via AskUserQuestion:

> "Should deployments require approval before each stage?"

Options:

• Required before each stage (Recommended for production)
• Staging auto-approve, production requires approval
• No approval gates — deploy automatically

Store as PP_APPROVAL_MODE.

Note: PP Pipelines always exports as a managed solution to target environments. Set EXPORT_TYPE = "managed" automatically — no question needed.

Q6 (auto-detect, no question): Resolve HAS_ENV_VARS in this order:

• If ENV_VARS_DETAILS.length > 0 (Phase 1 Step 10b returned per-variable rows): HAS_ENV_VARS = true. This is the most accurate signal — we've enumerated the definitions directly.
• Else if SPLIT_PLAN.sizeAnalysis.envVarCount.value > 0 (the size estimator counted definitions but the enumerator didn't return rows — usually because the publisher prefix or token was missing): HAS_ENV_VARS = true. The plan's count-summary fallback will explain to the user that per-variable details will be enumerated later.
• Else if SOLUTION_DONE = true and .solution-manifest.json lists components with componenttype 380: HAS_ENV_VARS = true. (Stale-manifest fallback — should rarely fire now that 10b is in place.)
• Otherwise: HAS_ENV_VARS = false. Variables will be discovered during setup-solution.

When HAS_ENV_VARS = true, the plan notes that deploy-pipeline will prompt for per-stage env var values (see Phase 3 risks population).

Manual Path — Q3 through Q6

<!-- gate: plan-alm:2.q3-manual | category=plan | cancel-leaves=nothing -->

> 🚦 Gate (plan · plan-alm:2.q3-manual): Pick how many target environments for manual export/import path.

Q3: Ask via AskUserQuestion:

> "How many target environments do you need to deploy to?"

Options:

• One target (e.g. Production)
• Two targets (e.g. Staging then Production)
• Dev only — not deploying yet

Store as MANUAL_TARGET_COUNT.

If option 3: set MANUAL_TARGET_COUNT = 0. Proceed to Q5.

<!-- gate: plan-alm:2.q4-manual-target | category=plan | cancel-leaves=nothing -->

> 🚦 Gate (plan · plan-alm:2.q4-manual-target): Pick the URL for each manual target env. Fires PER TARGET in the MANUAL_TARGET_COUNT loop. Two targets (Staging + Production) = two separate prompts. Each prompt pre-fills from pac env list and accepts a different URL. Do NOT collect all target URLs in a single multi-input prompt — each target is a distinct decision (different audiences, different env characteristics, possibly different SKUs).

Q4 (one per stage): For each target environment needed, ask via AskUserQuestion:

> "What is the URL for target environment {N}?"

Pre-fill from ENV_LIST: show up to 3 known environment URLs from pac env list as options, plus "Enter a different URL" as the last option.

Store target URLs as MANUAL_TARGETS (array).

<!-- gate: plan-alm:2.q5-manual-type | category=consent | cancel-leaves=nothing -->

> 🚦 Gate (consent · plan-alm:2.q5-manual-type): Managed vs Unmanaged export — irreversible choice for the produced zip.

Q5: Ask via AskUserQuestion:

> "How should the solution be exported?"

Options:

• Managed — for staging/production (cannot edit in target)
• Unmanaged — for dev-to-dev (editable in target)

Store as EXPORT_TYPE, and log the decision ({ field: "exportType", value: EXPORT_TYPE, source: "default"|"explicit" }).

> No checkpoint preference is collected. plan-alm no longer runs the export/import itself, so the old *"pause between export and import?"* question (which only gated execution) is gone. The plan records the recommended sequence — export-solution then import-solution per target — and the user reviews the zip between those steps when they run them. A standing note to that effect is added to the plan's risks/steps in Phase 3.

Q6 (auto-detect, no question): Same as PP Pipelines Q6 — check for env var definitions.

Phase 3 — Generate HTML Plan

Now create the two planner tasks — strategy is known. plan-alm is a planner, so it has exactly two tasks regardless of path:

| # | Subject | activeForm | Description |

|---|---------|-----------|-------------|

| 1 | Generate ALM plan | Generating ALM plan | Build planData, render docs/alm-plan.html |

| 2 | Approve & save ALM plan | Awaiting plan approval | Present inline summary, capture approver, save (approved or draft) |

> Do not create Setup/Deploy/Activate/Test/Import/Finalize tasks. Those are *execution* steps performed by the individual ALM skills the user runs after approval — they are not plan-alm tasks. The recommended sequence still appears in the plan: the planData steps[] array below lists it (all status: "pending"), and the rendered HTML's Execution Checklist shows it as the plan of record. Each downstream skill marks its own step complete (via refresh-alm-plan-data.js) when the user runs it.

Mark task 1 ("Generate ALM plan") as in_progress.

Build planData

Build a planData object with all gathered strategy inputs:

{
  "SITE_NAME": "{siteName}",
  "siteType": "code | declarative",        // from Phase 1 Step 1 — "declarative" (formerly "data-model") for enhanced/standard data-model (EDM) design-studio sites (no SPA build output), "code" for SPA sites
  "GENERATED_AT": "{ISO timestamp}",
  "STRATEGY": "pp-pipelines | manual",
  "EXPORT_TYPE": "managed | unmanaged",   // PP Pipelines path: always "managed"
  "APPROVAL_MODE": "{approvalMode description}",
  "HAS_ENV_VARS": true | false,
  "SOLUTION_DONE": true | false,
  "PIPELINE_DONE": true | false,
  "PLAN_STATUS": "Draft",                 // set to "Approved" or "Draft" in Phase 4; plan-alm never sets "In Execution"/"Completed"
  "PLAN_MODE": "draft",                   // "approved" | "draft" — set in Phase 4. Tooling/downstream skills distinguish an approved plan from a draft. Never "executed" (plan-alm doesn't execute).
  "PLAN_QUALITY": "complete",             // "complete" | "degraded" — degraded when discovery was incomplete (Phase 1 auth failure or the Phase 3 completeness check failed). Surfaced as a prominent risk.
  "decisionsLog": [                       // from DECISIONS_LOG (Phase 2) — drives the Phase 4 "Decisions defaulted" section
    { "field": "strategy", "value": "pp-pipelines", "source": "explicit" }
  ],
  "LAST_INVOCATION_AT": null,
  "APPROVED_BY": "",
  "APPROVAL_DATE": "",
  "stages": [