microsoft/personafy
> Build a new opinionated advisor-persona skill — a reviewer "lens" like crusty-old-engineer — modeled on a real person or archetype and proven from real evidence. Mines the subject's authentic voice and discipline, defines its one distinct load-bearing question, drafts it to the family template, proves it steers in a live session, reduces it, and publishes it to a skills bundle. Use when creating or authoring a persona/advisor skill, adding a sibling to the crusty-old-engineer family, or turning a person's real direction style into a reusable reviewer skill. Also triggers on "personafy" / "personify".
npx skills add https://github.com/microsoft/amplifier-bundle-skills --skill personafy
Build a new advisor-persona skill — an opinionated reviewer "lens" that joins an
existing family of sibling personas (e.g., crusty-old-engineer). The persona is
modeled on a real person or archetype, grounded in mined evidence, and enforces ONE
distinct recurring question.
Success artifact: a complete, family-conformant SKILL.md that is (a) grounded in
verbatim evidence, (b) *proven to steer* an LLM in a live session, (c) reduced to the
smallest set that still steers, and (d) loading from its target bundle in a fresh session.
<subject>: (Optional) The person or archetype to model, plus pointers to evidence(session corpora, transcripts, docs). If no corpus exists, derive the persona from a
written conceptual brief instead.
<family>: (Optional) The sibling persona skills to fit alongside. Defaults to theadvisor-persona family in amplifier-bundle-skills (e.g., crusty-old-engineer).
Read the existing sibling persona skills' SKILL.md in full. Extract: the shared section
template, the frontmatter/metadata shape, the tone-contract pattern (required / disallowed
/ style), and — critically — the single load-bearing question each sibling owns and how
they cross-reference each other.
Success criteria: You can state each sibling's distinct question in one line and
reproduce the shared template and metadata shape.
Run one or more existing personas live against a shared, realistic scenario — plus a
combined "consensus" run — to see how the written instructions translate into actual
behavior and steering.
self with context_depth="none" (one isolated run per persona).Success criteria: You've *seen* how each sibling's instructions become behavior, not
just read them — enough to know what makes the steering work.
Name the ONE distinct recurring question the new persona enforces. Build a contrast table
against every sibling.
Success criteria: A one-line lens plus a contrast table showing it is genuinely
distinct from each sibling.
Rule: if the question collapses into a sibling's, it is not a new persona — stop.
The heart of the method. Gather the subject's authentic voice and decision-discipline from
real data (use the conceptual fallback only if no corpus exists).
sessions (long-term backbone) and human-to-human transcripts (enrichment). Weight recent
material so it *informs* but doesn't *overpower* the long-term signal.
sub-sessions (agent-to-agent), and flag/exclude automated eval-harness / smoke-test noise.
Build a tracking directory + manifest + batches so the corpus never overflows your context.
bash (jq/grep/sed; never cat a huge session file — a single line canexceed your context window).
brief, writing structured findings to disk and returning only a thin summary. Many small
agents beat one overloaded agent.
model_role="research".final synthesizer produces ONE profile: recurring traits ranked by cross-source
corroboration, verbatim catchphrases, pet peeves, decision lenses, and the top
"this is them" quotes. Quarantine AI-authored vocabulary (don't attribute it to the
subject). Record confidence and which batches were synthetic.
model_role="reasoning".Conceptual fallback (no corpus): derive the same profile fields from a written brief
about the archetype; mark everything as designed-not-mined.
Success criteria: A consolidated profile where every load-bearing trait is backed by a
verbatim quote (or explicitly marked as designed), ranked by corroboration, with synthetic
noise excluded.
Rule: ground every claim in real evidence; an honest "N/A — not observed" beats a
fabricated trait.
Artifacts: the profile file path.
Write the skill mirroring the siblings exactly: identity (defined by negation — "not X, not
Y"), When-to-Use framed as a cross-stage lens, not a stage-gate, the tone contract
(required / disallowed / style), Core Behaviors each anchored in a verbatim quote from
the profile, an Output Structure, one worked Example, Explicit Non-Goals, a
Relationship-to-siblings section, and a Final Note. Match the family's frontmatter format.
Success criteria: A complete draft, structurally identical to the siblings, every
behavior grounded in the profile.
Rule: keep the verbatim quotes — they are the highest-signal tokens and the soul of the
persona.
Rule: do NOT include allowed-tools in the generated SKILL.md. Persona advisor skills are
inline (no context: fork), so the field is inert. If you must restrict tools for a fork-based
variant, use Amplifier module IDs (e.g. tool-filesystem, tool-bash, tool-delegate) —
never Claude Code tool names (Read, Grep, Bash, Agent).
Run the draft in a fresh CLI session against a real-ish scenario and confirm it adopts the
voice and hits each behavior.
amplifier run --mode single --output-format text \
"Load the skill \"<name>\" and review the following as that persona: <realistic scenario>"
Success criteria: A transcript showing the persona *behaving* as designed (voice + each
behavior firing).
Rule: proof is demonstrated behavior — "the file exists" is NOT proof.
Apply context-reduction: cut redundancy to the smallest set that still steers (drop restated
procedure, compress prose), but keep the verbatim quotes and the structural skeleton.
Re-prove (Step 6) if the cut was heavy.
Check the frontmatter description: length, not just the body. The Agent Skills spec
recommends a 1024-character ceiling on description, and Amplifier's tool-skills module logs
a warning past it (soft — it does not block loading or truncate anything — but every visible
skill's full description is injected into the model's context on every turn, so an over-long
one is a small, permanently-recurring token cost, not a one-time nuisance). Measure it (e.g.
python3 -c "import yaml; print(len(yaml.safe_load(open('SKILL.md').read().split('---')[1])['description']))")
and if it's near or past 1024, compress — do not relocate the trimmed content into the body,
since the visibility hook only ever shows description, never the body. The single highest-value
cut is almost always the negation-identity clause (e.g. "Not a long-term ownership-cost reviewer —
a reviewer of whether THIS bet, sized as proposed, is a bet the team can actually win." compresses
to "Not a cost reviewer — a bet-sizing reviewer." with zero loss of routing signal, since the full
nuance already lives in the body's Identity section). Never cut the "Use when:" trigger list itself
— that's the part carrying the routing weight this step must preserve.
Success criteria: A leaner SKILL.md with the same steering power, verified, and a
description: field at or below ~700–800 characters (matching sibling norms like
crusty-old-engineer/cranky-old-sam) — comfortably under the 1024 ceiling, not just barely under it.
Pick a name in the family's convention. A shareable archetype name (a generic role) →
a public bundle; a name that references a real person → a private/team bundle.
Success criteria: Name chosen and target bundle decided — public vs private matched to
whether the name exposes a real person.
Place SKILL.md at <bundle>/skills/<name>/SKILL.md. Verify the bundle exposes skills via
the canonical directory-discovery registration — its tool-skills config points
config.skills at the whole skills/ directory (#subdirectory=skills), so a new skill
dir is auto-discovered. Do NOT rely on per-skill wrapper behaviors. Then run the git
lifecycle.
foundation:git-ops.Success criteria: PR merged into the target bundle.
Rule: a SKILL.md in skills/ is NOT exposed unless the bundle points tool-skills
at the skills/ directory — registration is directory-based, not per-file.
Run amplifier update, then load the skill in a FRESH session and confirm loaded_from is
the bundle cache — not a local ~/.amplifier/skills copy.
Success criteria: load_skill resolves the skill from the bundle cache path in a clean
session.
Rule: "merged on main" ≠ "loads for a user" — verify discoverability end-to-end, the
same gate the persona itself would demand.
Take microsoft/personafy from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.