mcpbeat

Sdlc

hoangnguyen0403/sdlc

Route a task to the next synced SDLC workflow based on current artifacts and repo state.

2k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
536
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard --skill sdlc

The instruction itself

8 sections, as written by the author

Sdlc Skill

> [!IMPORTANT]

> Route a task to the next synced SDLC workflow based on current artifacts and repo state.

Optional args: slug=<feature>, ticket=<id/url>, mode=interactive|autonomous|channel, channel=<id>, auto_continue=true|false, profile=business|hybrid|technical.

Instructions

When the user asks to perform this workflow, execute the following steps:

SDLC Router Workflow

Goal: Select the next native workflow without loading every workflow body, while preserving a traceable BA -> PM -> IT Department handoff for offshore delivery.

Steps

  • Inspect state:
  • User request; infer operator_profile (business | hybrid | technical) per common-operator-profile and carry it in every Handoff Payload.
  • Search docs/brd/, docs/prd/, and docs/srs/ for a matching [slug]; if absent, use the newest BRD or git status. Slug = lowercase kebab-case, minted once at brainstorm-feature, reused verbatim downstream; never re-derived.
  • If multiple candidates exist, list them and ask whether to focus, consolidate, or sequence.
  • Baseline reference: docs/requirements-standards-baseline.md
  • Existing ticket, BRD-lite brief, PRD, SRS/FRS design, implementation plan, task list, walkthrough, UAT signoff, deployment report, release notes, and retro
  • Jira, ADO, Zephyr, or other MCP context when already configured
  • Changed files and current test status
  • Offshore delivery context: business owner, product owner, implementation owners, QA owner, timezone/cadence constraints, environments, release window, and dependency teams
  • Requirement trace health: BRD-OBJ-* -> REQ-* -> AC-* -> SRS-* -> test evidence
  • Choose next workflow (apply tie-break order when multiple bullets match: (1) workflow explicitly named by the operator or by the latest recommended_next_workflow, (2) production-incident/urgent-regression signals, (3) earliest missing artifact along the chain below — never skip forward past a gap, (4) cross-cutting audits only on request or as a pre-release gate):
  • Unclear idea, missing business case, missing stakeholder owner, or missing measurable value (BRD-lite / Why, BA-owned intake) -> brainstorm-feature
  • BRD-lite exists or business direction is clear but product scope, priorities, acceptance criteria, rollout, or delivery plan are unclear (PRD / What, PM-owned planning) -> plan-feature
  • PRD exists but technical behavior/contracts unclear (SRS/FRS / How) -> design-solution
  • Architecture, auth, trust boundaries, compliance controls, or agent/runtime safety need deeper technical validation -> design-solution
  • BRD-lite, PRD, or SRS/FRS exists but readiness unclear -> implementation-readiness
  • Approved plan with BRD/PRD/SRS trace and testable ACs needs code -> implement-feature
  • Production incident or urgent regression -> incident-hotfix
  • Bug ticket needs fix (non-urgent) -> dev-fix
  • Ticket or cross-functional change needs specialist fanout, AC coverage, and PR metadata review -> review-ticket
  • PR diff needs focused merge-risk review -> code-review
  • Code complete but unproven -> verify-work
  • Fix implemented and ticket has a UAT/Jira flow -> verify-bug
  • verify-work PASS on a feature, business acceptance not yet granted -> uat-signoff
  • Business acceptance granted and release window open -> deploy-release
  • Deployed and needs user-facing communication -> publish-notes
  • Trace health unknown before release or handoff -> traceability-audit
  • Session ending with unfinished work or context handoff -> session-report
  • Deployed or communicated, capture standards/process lessons -> retro-learn
  • Repo-wide health/debt question with no single feature in scope -> codebase-review
  • Enforce handoff quality:
  • BA output must include business objective, stakeholder/validation owner, AS-IS/TO-BE, SMART metric, scope fence, risks, assumptions, and BRD objective IDs.
  • PM output must link each PRD requirement and AC to a BRD objective, name requirement owners/status/priority, define rollout/ops, and identify whether design-solution is required.
  • IT Department handoff must include implementation owner candidates, affected repos/modules, test lanes, environments, release/rollback notes, and open blockers.
  • Never route directly to implementation when BRD/PRD/SRS trace, owner, or testable ACs are missing; route to BA/PM/design first.
  • This applies even when the request explicitly says "implement" or names a specific feature/module: if docs/brd/ and docs/prd/ have no matching [slug] for it yet, the FIRST slice dispatched must be a brainstorm-feature or plan-feature intake slice (owner ba-agent/pm-agent) — never an implementation-readiness/design-solution/implement-feature slice as slice-01. Missing repo roots, OAuth/client IDs, or session-policy decisions are a sign the BRD/PRD step was skipped, not questions to resolve inline in an implementation slice.
  • Keep payloads runtime-neutral; adapters may map them to task boards, MCP, Jira, GitHub, ADO, Zephyr, or local files.
  • Set runtime state:
  • Interactive: ask max 3 blocking questions.
  • Autonomous/channel: continue only when required artifacts and owners are known; otherwise return BLOCKED.
  • Emit next workflow, handoff payload, verification command, and owner.

Runtime Contract

  • Use to select the next workflow without loading every workflow body.
  • Required inputs: user request plus repo/artifact state.
  • Return BLOCKED only in autonomous/channel mode when required artifacts or owners are unknown.

Handoff Payload

  • slug, operator_profile, recommended workflow, requirement layer, handoff owner, required input, blocking gaps, offshore delivery notes.

Blocking Questions

  • Ask max 3 at a time with a recommended default and 2-3 options.

Output Template

# SDLC Route

## Recommended Workflow

## Requirement Layer

## Handoff Owner

## Required Input

## Blocking Gaps

## Offshore Delivery Notes

## Outcome Report
feature_status: not_started | requirements_ready | design_ready | partially_implemented | implemented | blocked
requirement_trace: BRD-OBJ-* -> REQ-* -> AC-* -> SRS-* -> evidence
completed_evidence: []; missing_evidence: []; decision_needed: []; recommended_next_workflow:

## Next Workflow

## Verification Command
## Cost Report
Call `get_session_cost(workflow="sdlc")` before final handoff.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take hoangnguyen0403/sdlc from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.