mcpbeat

Node Compat

denoland/node-compat

Run a Node.js compatibility test, diagnose failures, and either fix the implementation, skip, or ignore the test. Use when asked to work on node compat tests.

1k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
107984
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/denoland/deno --skill node-compat

What it tells the agent to use

found in the instruction text
Bash runs shell commands — read the instruction before connecting
Read reads your files
Grep reads your files

The instruction itself

16 sections, as written by the author

Node Compat Test

Work on Node.js compatibility test $ARGUMENTS.

Step 1: Build and run the test

./x build
./x test-compat $ARGUMENTS

If the test passes, report success and ensure test is specified in

tests/node_compat/config.jsonc.

Step 2: Diagnose the failure

Read the test file to understand what it tests:

# Tests live under tests/node_compat/test/

Use Grep and Read to find the test source, then analyze:

  • What Node.js API or behavior is being tested?
  • What is the actual error or assertion failure?
  • Where is the relevant Deno implementation? Check ext/node/ (polyfills,

ops, internal bindings), runtime/, or cli/.

Read the corresponding Node.js docs and/or source code to understand the

expected behavior.

Step 3: Classify the failure

Determine which category this failure falls into:

A. Fixable bug

The Deno implementation is wrong or incomplete, but can be corrected. This

includes:

  • Missing method/property on a polyfill
  • Wrong return value or error type
  • Missing event emission
  • Incorrect argument handling
  • Hard-to-fix but still fundamentally implementable behaviors

Action: Fix the implementation (Step 4).

B. Inherent incompatibility

The test relies on Node.js internals or architecture that Deno fundamentally

cannot or will not support:

  • internalBinding() calls to Node's C++ layer
  • Node.js-specific CLI flags (--inspect, --prof, etc.)
  • V8 internals exposed through Node-specific APIs
  • Node.js-specific build/addon tooling (node-gyp internals)
  • Tests for Node.js's own test infrastructure

Action: Ignore the test with a reason (Step 5).

C. Not worth fixing

The test exercises an edge case or behavior that is technically possible but

provides negligible value:

  • Extremely obscure error message wording differences
  • Node.js-specific deprecation warnings
  • Behavior that no real-world code depends on

Action: Ignore or skip the test with a reason (Step 5).

Step 4: Fix the implementation

If the failure is fixable:

  • Locate the relevant code in ext/node/ (or elsewhere).
  • Implement the fix. Match Node.js behavior - check Node.js docs and/or source

code, not just what "seems right."

  • Use lazy-loaded imports where possible.
  • Use primordials for internal JS code to avoid prototype pollution.
  • Rebuild the source code with ./x build - this is paramount, changes won't

take effect until you do.

  • Re-run the test to verify the fix:
./x test-compat $ARGUMENTS
  • Once the test passes, make sure the test is listed in

tests/node_compat/config.jsonc with an empty config:

"category/test-name.js": {}

The entries in config.jsonc are sorted alphabetically within their category.

Place the new entry in the correct position.

Step 5: Skip or ignore the test

If the test cannot or should not be fixed, update

tests/node_compat/config.jsonc.

Ignore (test should never run — inherent incompatibility)

"category/test-name.js": {
  "ignore": true,
  "reason": "Brief, specific explanation of why this can't work in Deno"
}

"reason" must be specified otherwise the lint step will fail!

Platform-specific skip

If the test only fails on certain platforms:

"category/test-name.js": {
  "windows": false
}

Expected failure (test runs but fails with known output)

If you want the test to run but expect a specific failure:

"category/test-name.js": {
  "exitCode": 1,
  "output": "[WILDCARD]specific error message[WILDCARD]",
  "reason": "Brief explanation of why this fails"
}

This is a good middle ground for tests that are generally compatible but have a

specific known issue. If a fix is ever done this assertion will notify the

implementer to update the config.

Writing good reasons

Reasons should be specific and actionable. Good examples:

  • "Tests Node.js internal C++ binding (internalBinding('zlib').Zlib) which is

not implemented in Deno"

  • "requires deno --interactive flag (not yet implemented)"
  • "URL.createObjectURL does not throw ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE for non-Blob

arguments"

Bad examples:

  • "Not supported" (too vague)
  • "Doesn't work" (says nothing)
  • "Node-specific" (which part?)

Step 6: Verify

Re-run the test one final time to confirm the outcome matches expectations:

./x test-compat $ARGUMENTS

Config reference

The full schema for config.jsonc entries is in

tests/node_compat/schema.json.

PR title conventions

When opening a PR for node-compat work, use the appropriate prefix:

  • test: — when the PR only updates tests/node_compat/config.jsonc to skip,

ignore, or otherwise reclassify tests without changing implementation code.

  • fix(ext/node): — when the PR actually fixes the implementation so a

previously failing test now passes (typically changes under ext/node/ plus

enabling the test in config.jsonc).

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take denoland/node-compat from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.