Analyze Crash

Stack Trace Crash Analysis for dd-trace-dotnet

You are analyzing a crash stack trace for the dd-trace-dotnet repository. Perform a comprehensive investigation to help engineers understand and triage the crash. Focus on de-mystifying the crashing thread and explaining how the crash occurred.

Input Processing

The user has provided a crash stack trace. Parse and analyze it systematically.

Analysis Workflow

GitHub Link Generation

When referencing files in the dd-trace-dotnet repository, always provide clickable GitHub links in addition to local paths:

Format:

[filename:line](https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-dotnet/blob/master/path/to/file#Lline)

Examples:

• Single line: cor_profiler.cpp:1430
• Line range: rejit_handler.cpp:263-296

When to use:

• All file:line references in Executive Summary
• Stack Trace Classification table "Location" column (when file paths are available)
• All code context section headings
• Related Code section

Path construction:

• Base URL: https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-dotnet/blob/master/
• Append the repository-relative path (strip C:\Users\...\dd-trace-dotnet\ or similar prefixes)
• Add #L{lineNumber} for single line or #L{start}-L{end} for ranges
• Example: Local path C:\Users\...\dd-trace-dotnet\tracer\src\Datadog.Tracer.Native\cor_profiler.cpp:1430 becomes cor_profiler.cpp:1430

Phase 1: Parse & Classify Stack Frames

Extract all stack frames and classify each one:

Classification Categories:

• CLR Runtime: Functions like ReJitManager::, ProfToEEInterfaceImpl::, ICorProfiler*, CLR DLL references (clr.dll, coreclr.dll, mscorwks.dll)
• dd-trace-dotnet Native: Namespace patterns (trace::, debugger::, fault_tolerant::, iast::), or paths containing Datadog.Tracer.Native
• dd-trace-dotnet Managed: References to Datadog.Trace.dll!
• External/Application: Everything else (customer code, third-party libraries, framework code)

Create a classification table showing frame number, type, location, and brief description.

Phase 2: Locate dd-trace-dotnet Code

For each dd-trace-dotnet frame that includes file path and line number:

• Extract and normalize path: Remove build-specific prefixes
• Strip: c:\mnt\, D:\a\_work\1\s\, /home/runner/work/dd-trace-dotnet/, etc.
• Result should be relative to repo root: tracer/src/Datadog.Tracer.Native/{filename}

• Find file in repository:
• First try direct path match
• If not found, use Glob tool with pattern: /Datadog.Tracer.Native//{filename}
• If still not found, try just the filename: **/{filename}

• Read code with context:
• Find the function containing the crash line
• Include 10-15 lines before the crash line
• Mark or highlight the actual crash line
• Include 5-10 lines after
• Show enough context to understand what the code is doing

Phase 3: Code Context Extraction

For each critical dd-trace-dotnet frame:

• Show the function signature
• Include surrounding code (described in Phase 2)
• Clearly mark the crash line with a comment like // >>> CRASH POINT <<<
• Explain what this code does
• Explain why it crashed based on the evidence

Format each code section as:

### Frame X: {function_name} ([{file}:{line}](GitHub link))

​```cpp
// {file}:{start_line}-{end_line}
{code with crash line marked}
​```

**Analysis**: {Explanation of what this code does and why it failed}

Phase 4: Reconstruct Crash Flow

Build a narrative explaining the execution flow leading to the crash. This is the primary goal of the analysis - to help engineers understand what happened:

• Entry point: Where did execution start? (e.g., profiler callback, background thread loop)
• Key operations: What was the code trying to do?
• Critical transitions: Where did control flow between components?
• Failure point: Where and why did it crash?
• Crash type: Describe what type of crash this is (e.g., null pointer dereference, access violation, invalid module reference, race condition, etc.)

Write this as a clear, step-by-step narrative that someone unfamiliar with the code can follow. Focus on explaining HOW the crash happened based on the evidence in the stack trace and code, without prescribing a specific fix.

Phase 5: Identify Related Code

Use Bash tool with git commands to find relevant context, focusing on commits associated with PRs:

• Check recent commits to the affected files: git log --oneline -10 {file}
• Search for related changes: git log --grep="crash" --grep="fix" --oneline -20 (use keywords relevant to the crash area)
• For each relevant commit, check if it's associated with a PR:
• Look for PR numbers in commit messages (e.g., "(#1234)" or "PR #1234")
• If found, construct PR link: https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-dotnet/pull/{number}
• Prioritize commits with PR associations - these have more context
• Look for similar code patterns in other files that might provide context

Focus on commits with PR links - PRs provide valuable context including descriptions, discussions, and rationale that individual commits lack.

Output Format

Generate a well-formatted markdown document with these sections:

# Crash Analysis Report
**Generated**: {ISO 8601 timestamp}

## Executive Summary
{2-3 sentence summary of what crashed and where in the code. Focus on demystifying the crash location and describing what the crashing thread was doing.}

## Stack Trace Classification

### Crashed Thread: #{thread_number}

| # | Type | Location | Description |
|---|------|----------|-------------|
| 0 | {type} | {function/location} | {brief description} |
| 1 | {type} | {function/location} | {brief description} |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

{If multiple threads provided, note other interesting threads but focus on crashed thread}

## Code Context

{For each critical dd-trace-dotnet frame, show code with analysis}

### Frame X: {function} ([{file}:{line}](GitHub link))

​```cpp
{code snippet with crash line marked}
​```

**Analysis**: {Explanation of what this code does}

## Crash Flow Reconstruction

{Step-by-step narrative explaining the execution flow from start to crash point}

**Crash Type**: {Description of what type of crash this is - e.g., null pointer dereference, access violation, invalid module reference, race condition}

**How it happened**: {Clear explanation of the sequence of events that led to the crash based on the stack trace and code analysis}

## Related Code

**Relevant PRs and commits**:
- [#{PR number}](https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-dotnet/pull/{PR number}): {PR title/description} - {why relevant}
- [#{PR number}](https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-dotnet/pull/{PR number}): {PR title/description} - {why relevant}

{Only include commits without PR associations if they are particularly relevant}

**Related code locations**:
- [{file}:{line}](GitHub link) - {description}
- [{file}:{line}](GitHub link) - {description}

## Additional Context

{Any additional useful context about the application environment, runtime, features in use, or relevant background}

---
*Analysis generated by Claude Code /analyze-crash command*
*This analysis is intended to help understand and triage the crash. Engineers should review this analysis to determine if a code fix is needed.*

Output File Management

• Create output directory:
• On Windows: Use powershell.exe -NoProfile -Command 'New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force -Path (Join-Path $env:USERPROFILE ".claude\analysis") | Select-Object -ExpandProperty FullName'
• On Linux/Mac: Use mkdir -p ~/.claude/analysis && echo ~/.claude/analysis
• IMPORTANT: On Windows, you MUST use single quotes around the PowerShell command to prevent bash from interpreting $env:USERPROFILE
• Generate filename: Use format crash-analysis-{YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS}.md (e.g., crash-analysis-20250316-143022.md)
• Save file: Write the markdown analysis to the file
• Return path: Tell the user the full path where the analysis was saved

Important Guidelines

• Focus on triage and understanding: The goal is to help engineers understand HOW the crash happened, not to prescribe specific fixes
• Describe crash types: It's okay to identify what type of crash this is (e.g., null pointer, race condition, invalid reference), but don't match against fixed "patterns"
• End at explanation: Phase 4 (Crash Flow Reconstruction) should provide a clear explanation of how the crash occurred. Engineers will then decide on fixes
• No fix suggestions: Do not suggest code changes, patches, or specific implementation fixes. Focus on analysis only
• Handle path variations gracefully: Stack traces from different build environments will have different path prefixes
• Continue with missing information: If a file can't be located, note this but continue the analysis with available information
• Focus on the crashed thread: If multiple threads are provided, focus primarily on the crashed thread but mention other relevant threads
• Be concise but thorough: Provide enough detail to understand the issue without unnecessary verbosity
• Always include GitHub links: Every file:line reference should have a clickable GitHub link to master branch
• Prefer PR links over commits: When git log finds relevant commits, prioritize those associated with PRs. Extract PR numbers from commit messages (e.g., "(#1234)") and link to the PR: https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-dotnet/pull/{number}. Only include standalone commit links if particularly relevant and not part of a PR
• Mark uncertainties: If something is unclear or speculative, explicitly state this

Now Analyze

Parse the stack trace provided by the user and follow the workflow above to generate a comprehensive crash analysis.