cosmicstack-labs/meeting-note-summarizer
Transforms messy meeting transcripts, notes, or voice memos into structured summaries with clear action items, decisions, and key takeaways. Designed for freelancers, remote teams, and solopreneurs who need to extract signal from hours of meetings.
npx skills add https://github.com/cosmicstack-labs/mercury-agent-skills --skill meeting-note-summarizer
Takes raw meeting notes, voice transcripts, or bullet-point jumbles and turns them into clean, structured summaries organized by: Decisions, Action Items, Key Discussion Points, and Next Steps. No more digging through pages of notes to find what was actually decided.
Every summary follows this template (adapted based on meeting type):
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MEETING SUMMARY │
│ Topic: [Meeting Title] │
│ Date: [Date] │
│ Duration: [Duration] │
│ Participants: [People] │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ 🎯 DECISIONS │
│ • [What was decided] │
│ • [Rationale if stated] │
│ │
│ ✅ ACTION ITEMS │
│ • [Task] → [Owner] → [Deadline] │
│ • [Task] → [Owner] → [Deadline] │
│ │
│ 💬 KEY DISCUSSION POINTS │
│ • [Topic 1 — 1-2 sentence summary] │
│ • [Topic 2 — 1-2 sentence summary] │
│ │
│ ⏭️ NEXT STEPS │
│ • [Follow-up action] │
│ • [Next meeting date / check-in] │
│ │
│ 📎 ATTACHMENTS / REFERENCES │
│ • [Links, docs, resources mentioned] │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
| Section | Focus |
|---------|-------|
| Client Status | How is the client feeling? Satisfied, concerned, urgent? |
| Scope Changes | Any new requests, changes, or scope creep? |
| Feedback | What did they approve or reject? |
| Deliverables Due | What are you committing to deliver? |
| Section | Focus |
|---------|-------|
| Ideas Generated | List all ideas, however rough |
| Themes | Patterns across ideas |
| Promising Directions | Which ideas have energy behind them? |
| Killed Ideas | What was ruled out and why? |
| Next Experiment | What should be tested/prototyped? |
| Section | Focus |
|---------|-------|
| Check-In | How is the person doing? |
| Challenges Shared | What's blocking them? |
| Advice Given | What guidance was offered? |
| Accountability | What did they commit to trying? |
| Section | Focus |
|---------|-------|
| Completed | What shipped since last sync |
| In Progress | What's being actively worked on |
| Blockers | What's stuck and who can help |
| Plan | What's next |
| Phrase | Action |
|--------|--------|
| "Summarize these notes..." | Takes raw text → structured summary |
| "Here are my meeting notes..." | Parses, organizes, and returns clean summary |
| "Extract action items from..." | Returns only the ✅ Action Items section |
| "What did we decide in..." | Surfaces decisions only |
| "Turn this transcript into..." | Full meeting summary from raw transcript |
| "Client call notes..." | Applies client call format |
| "Brainstorm session notes..." | Applies creative session format |
| "Make this shorter..." | Condenses — 1 sentence per section max |
Accept notes in any format:
| Signal | Type |
|--------|------|
| Client, deliverable, feedback | Client Call |
| Ideas, concepts, "what if" | Brainstorm |
| Status, blockers, standup | Standup |
| How are you, coaching, growth | 1:1 / Coaching |
| General | Standard |
If unclear → ask: "What kind of meeting was this?"
Parse the input and tag each sentence/clause into:
Apply the output template. Use:
If the notes are ambiguous, call it out:
For long meetings (45min+), lead with a one-sentence TL;DR:
> TL;DR: Client approved the Q2 campaign direction. You need to deliver the creative brief by Thursday and schedule a follow-up for next Tuesday.
> Raw Input:
> "meeting with sarah about the website redesign. she likes the new hero section but thinks the CTA is too small. we need to make it bigger and maybe red. also the testimonial section needs real photos not stock. she'll send us the client photos by wed. i need to update the mockup by friday. we decided to drop the animations page since it's out of scope. next meeting next tuesday?"
>
> Output:
> `
> ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
> │ MEETING SUMMARY │
> │ Topic: Website Redesign Feedback │
> │ With: Sarah (Client) │
> │ Duration: ~30 min │
> ├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
> │ │
> │ 🎯 DECISIONS │
> │ • Drop the animations page (out of scope) │
> │ │
> │ ✅ ACTION ITEMS │
> │ • Sarah sends client photos → Sarah → Wed │
> │ • Update mockup (larger CTA, real photos) → You → Fri │
> │ │
> │ 💬 KEY DISCUSSION POINTS │
> │ • Hero section approved pending CTA size increase │
> │ • Testimonials need real client photos, not stock │
> │ • Animations page cut from scope │
> │ │
> │ ⏭️ NEXT STEPS │
> │ • Next check-in: Next Tuesday │
> │ │
> └─────────────────────────────────────────┘
> `
> Raw Input:
> "brainstorm for new newsletter format. someone suggested a weekly roundup of tools. another idea was a deep dive into one topic per issue. also could do founder interviews. sarah said the roundup might be too generic. mark said deep dive would take too long. we all liked the interview idea. tom will reach out to 3 potential guests. let's test one interview format and see open rates."
>
> Output:
> `
> ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
> │ BRAINSTORM: NEWSLETTER FORMAT │
> │ Participants: Sarah, Mark, Tom, You │
> ├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
> │ │
> │ 💡 IDEAS GENERATED │
> │ • Weekly tool roundup (killed — too generic) │
> │ • Single deep-dive per issue (killed — too time-heavy) │
> │ • Founder interviews (selected ✅) │
> │ │
> │ ✅ ACTION ITEMS │
> │ • Reach out to 3 potential guests → Tom → This week │
> │ • Draft interview format template → You → Fri │
> │ │
> │ ⏭️ NEXT STEPS │
> │ • Tom shares guest shortlist → review together │
> │ • Run 1 test issue → measure open rates │
> │ │
> └─────────────────────────────────────────┘
> `
Take cosmicstack-labs/meeting-note-summarizer from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.