mcpbeat

Requirements Elicitation

bitwarden/requirements-elicitation

Extract complete, unambiguous requirements from specifications. Use when analyzing feature requests, processing enhancement specifications, or identifying missing information. Trigger phrases: "extract requirements", "analyze specification", "identify requirements", "clarify ambiguities". After extracting requirements, use the `work-breakdown` skill.

2k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
2
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
129
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/ai-plugins --skill requirements-elicitation

What comes with it

1 951 bytes besides the instruction
examples/export-functionality.md

The instruction itself

17 sections, as written by the author

Requirements Elicitation

Key Capabilities

  • Extract Requirements — Identify functional and non-functional requirements from multiple sources
  • Clarify Ambiguities — Flag unclear specifications and formulate targeted questions
  • Identify Constraints — Find technical, business, security, and resource limitations
  • Categorize Requirements — Organize by type (functional, non-functional, security, performance)

Approach

1. Read and Understand

  • Read entire specification thoroughly, including all referenced documents
  • Identify the primary source (main requirement) vs. supporting documentation
  • Note the scope and context of the request

2. Extract Explicit Requirements

  • Capture clearly stated requirements
  • Document exact specifications (API signatures, data formats, performance metrics)
  • Preserve technical details verbatim

3. Identify Implicit Requirements

  • Infer unstated but necessary requirements (e.g., error handling, validation, logging)
  • Consider security implications based on Bitwarden security principles (P01-P06)
  • Identify data classification needs (Vault Data, Protected Data, secure channels)

4. Flag Ambiguities and Gaps

  • Document unclear or missing information
  • Formulate specific questions to resolve ambiguities
  • Identify conflicting requirements between sources
  • Note assumptions being made

5. Document Constraints

  • Technical constraints (APIs, platforms, compatibility)
  • Security constraints (data protection, authentication, authorization)
  • Resource constraints (performance, storage, bandwidth)
  • Business constraints (timeline, scope, dependencies)

6. Create Acceptance Criteria

  • For each requirement, define testable acceptance criteria
  • Specify verification methods (commands, tests, manual checks)
  • Include edge cases and error scenarios

Bitwarden-Specific Considerations

Security Requirements

Always consider and document:

  • Data classification — Is this Vault Data, Protected Data, or other?
  • Data states — Requirements for data at rest, in use, in transit
  • Security channels — Need for secure/trusted channels?
  • Security principles — Which principles (P01-P06) apply?
  • Threat scenarios — What could go wrong?

Common Bitwarden Requirement Types

  • Authentication/Authorization — Who can access what?
  • Encryption — What data needs protection and how?
  • Zero-knowledge — Server must not have access to plaintext (P01)
  • Cross-platform — Works on all Bitwarden clients?
  • Backwards compatibility — Maintains existing behavior?

Example

See examples/export-functionality.md for a complete worked example.

Best Practices

Do's

  • ✅ Ask "what" questions, not "how" — Focus on requirements, not implementation
  • ✅ Document assumptions explicitly — Make implicit knowledge visible
  • ✅ Create testable acceptance criteria — Avoid vague success measures
  • ✅ Consider all user types — Free users, premium, enterprise, admins
  • ✅ Think about edge cases — Empty vaults, huge vaults, network failures
  • ✅ Reference Bitwarden security principles — Ground security requirements in P01-P06
  • ✅ Use Bitwarden vocabulary — Standard terminology for data, channels, security

Don'ts

  • ❌ Avoid: Making technical implementation decisions — That's the architect's job
  • ❌ Avoid: Assuming unstated requirements are obvious — Explicit is better
  • ❌ Avoid: Generic acceptance criteria — "It works" is not testable
  • ❌ Avoid: Ignoring security implications — Security is never optional at Bitwarden
  • ❌ Avoid: Skipping constraints — They're as important as requirements

Output Format

Organize extracted requirements in structured sections:

## Functional Requirements

1. REQ-F-001: [Specific capability the system must have]
   - **Acceptance Criteria**: [Testable condition]
   - **Priority**: Critical | High | Medium | Low

## Non-Functional Requirements

- **Performance**: [Response time, throughput, resource usage]
- **Reliability**: [Error handling, edge cases, availability]
- **Compatibility**: [Platform support, backwards compatibility]
- **Usability**: [User experience expectations]

## Security Requirements

- **Data Classification**: [Vault Data | Protected Data | Other]
- **Security Principles**: [P01, P02, P03, P04, P05, P06 as applicable]
- **Threat Considerations**: [What could go wrong?]

## Constraints

- **Technical**: [APIs, platforms, dependencies]
- **Business**: [Timeline, scope, resources]
- **Security**: [Compliance, encryption, authentication]

## Open Questions

1. [Specific question needing stakeholder input]
2. [Ambiguity requiring clarification]
3. [Missing information that blocks complete specification]

## Assumptions

- [Assumption 1: explicit statement of what's assumed]
- [Assumption 2: should be validated with stakeholders]

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take bitwarden/requirements-elicitation from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.