mcpbeat

Night Market Validation And Qa

athola/night-market-validation-and-qa

Enforce evidence bar, coverage gates, and regression guards. Use when adding tests or claiming done. Do not use to run suites; use night-market-operations.

3k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
324
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/athola/claude-night-market --skill night-market-validation-and-qa

The instruction itself

16 sections, as written by the author

Validation and QA: what counts as evidence here

This skill defines the evidence bar for claiming work complete, the

coverage and quality thresholds that gate merges, the golden regression

tests that guard settled battles, and the procedure for adding tests.

The one-line thesis: a green check proves spec-satisfaction, not

correctness, so every completion claim needs cited evidence and every

test needs proof it can fail.

The evidence bar

Never claim "should work". Run the thing, capture the output, cite it.

The house discipline comes from Skill(imbue:proof-of-work):

  • Number every piece of evidence: [E1], [E2], each with the exact

command and its captured output.

  • Map each acceptance criterion to evidence with a verdict:

Criterion: [E2] -> PASS or -> FAIL.

  • Give the overall claim one of three statuses: COMPLETE (all

criteria passed), PARTIAL (list blockers), BLOCKED (explain

why). A blocked task reported as blocked with evidence is a

successful report. A guessed "done" is not.

  • The final response must not contain "should work", "looks right",

or any other unverified confidence phrase.

Verifier integrity: never let the generator judge itself

A passing verifier can mislead two ways (from the prover-verifier

research, codified in commit 29081fda, module

plugins/imbue/skills/proof-of-work/modules/verifier-integrity.md):

| Failure mode | What it looks like |

|--------------|--------------------|

| Wrong spec | The check confirms the code matches the spec, not that the spec matches intent |

| Hollow check | assert True, a mock returning the expected value, a stubbed service: all green, all worthless |

Rules that follow:

  • The agent that wrote the code must not be the sole judge of whether

the code works. Use an independent check: a fresh subagent, the real

test suite, a human, or an end-to-end run the generator cannot

influence.

  • Validate the spec separately from the code. A machine-checked pass

against a wrong spec is confident, green, and wrong.

  • When reviewing a test, ask what change to the code would make it

fail. If nothing would, it is not a test.

Iron Law TDD (Constitution rule 3)

CONSTITUTION.md rule 3: no implementation without a failing test

first. Scope:

  • Applies to every code change in plugin Python sources

(plugins/*/src/, plugins/*/scripts/, plugins/*/hooks/).

  • Skill files, agent files, and prose docs are exempt. Their analogue

is a structural validation test: every new skill needs a

test_skill_<name>.py proving the structure.

A structural validation test asserts observable content in the skill

file: required sections exist, the referenced modules exist on disk,

tables and examples the skill promises are present. Model on

plugins/imbue/tests/unit/skills/test_proof_of_work.py, which checks

SKILL.md sections, module files, and enforcement tables. The test must

fail if someone deletes the section it guards (see the

tautological-test trap below).

Thresholds

| Gate | Value | Where defined | Enforced by |

|------|-------|---------------|-------------|

| Root coverage | fail_under = 85 | root pyproject.toml [tool.coverage.report] | root pytest runs |

| Per-plugin coverage | coverage_threshold in [tool.nightmarket], 90 for most plugins, 85 for gauntlet | plugins/<p>/pyproject.toml | scripts/run-plugin-tests.sh passes --cov-fail-under only when the key is set and > 0 |

| Mutation testing | weekly Sunday 00:00 UTC cron mutates only sanctum (the matrix falls back to sanctum when the dispatch input is empty); abstract/imbue/attune run only via manual dispatch with plugin=all or a named plugin | .github/workflows/mutation-testing.yml | mutmut: exit 0 = no survivors, exit 2 = survivors (allowed), anything else = crash |

| Critical issues | max_critical_issues: 3, enforce_blocking: true | .claude/quality_gates.json | quality-gate tooling |

| File size | < 20KB and < 5000 tokens per file | .claude/quality_gates.json | advisory (block_on_violation: false) |

| Function length | <= 60 lines, complexity < 12, nesting <= 5, debt ratio < 0.3 | .claude/quality_gates.json | advisory, except security dimension which blocks |

Notes:

  • The run-plugin-tests.sh awk parser reads coverage_threshold from

[tool.nightmarket], never from addopts. Use

scripts/fix_coverage_threshold.py to migrate a plugin still using

the old location.

  • The script itself sets no minimum floor for coverage_threshold. If

the key is absent, no --cov-fail-under flag is passed at all, so a

plugin without the key has no coverage gate in the runner.

  • imbue's own addopts force --cov=scripts plus term and HTML

coverage reports on every run, including single-file runs.

The tautological-test trap

PR review here repeatedly catches tests that assert nothing. Evidence

in history: a94240e2 (12 tests of constants tightened to behavioral

coverage), f1cbbcf1 (strengthened tautological assertions),

30e58586 (validation-floor regression test), 42f7ce84 (round-trip

test replacing a structure-only check). The pattern: a test that

restates the code, mocks the unit under test, or asserts a constant

equals itself.

The counter-discipline is the revert test, executed by

sanctum:validate-pr:

  • Take the fix the PR claims to make.
  • Edit the fixed line back to its broken state (working tree must be

clean first, or the step is skipped as unsafe).

  • Run the test that supposedly guards the fix.
  • The test must FAIL against the reverted code. If it stays green,

the test is a dead assertion, not a guard.

  • Restore the fix.

When writing a new test, apply the same standard preemptively: write

the test so it would catch the bug's return, then confirm it fails

before the fix lands (that is the Iron Law's RED step).

Golden inventory: regression guards worth knowing

These tests lock in lessons from settled incidents. Do not weaken or

delete them without understanding the incident they guard.

| Guard | Location | What it locks |

|-------|----------|---------------|

| py39 datetime alias | plugins/leyline/tests/test_python39_compat.py | AST-scans leyline source for datetime.UTC (a 3.11+ alias). Hooks run under system Python 3.9, and this alias broke the whole hook import chain three-plus times. Ruff UP017 kept auto-reverting manual fixes, so only this AST invariant test holds the line. |

| Lazy-import blocker | plugins/gauntlet/tests/unit/test_challenges.py | Installs a sys.meta_path blocker that raises on any re-import of anthropic, proving gauntlet's heavy deps stay lazily imported. Eager imports made every git commit emit hook ModuleNotFoundError. |

| Hook timeout budget | plugins/herald/tests/unit/test_double_shot_latte.py (test_llm_timeout_fits_within_hook_timeout) | Asserts LLM_TIMEOUT_SECONDS is strictly less than the Stop-hook timeout registered in hooks.json. A timeout above the budget once cost the hook its verdict entirely (full record: night-market-failure-archaeology SB7). |

| Hook stdin contract | plugins/abstract/tests/hooks/test_hook_io.py | Locks the input contract of shared/hook_io.py: stdin JSON is primary, legacy CLAUDE_TOOL_* env vars are fallback only. Env-reading hooks were once silent no-ops for months (full record: night-market-failure-archaeology SB9). |

When you fix an incident of a similar class, add its guard here in the

same spirit: an invariant test that fails loudly if the lesson is

unlearned.

How to add tests

Layout and isolation

  • Each plugin owns plugins/<plugin>/tests/ with unit/,

integration/ subdirectories and its own conftest.py and pytest

config in the plugin's pyproject.toml.

  • Root pyproject.toml sets norecursedirs = ["plugins/*", ...].

Plugin tests MUST run per-plugin. Running them from the repo root

causes ImportPathMismatchError from duplicate module names (the root

conftest.py documents this).

Commands

# Single test file (fastest loop)
cd plugins/imbue
uv run pytest tests/unit/test_deferred_capture.py -x -q

# Full suite for one plugin
cd plugins/<plugin>
uv run python -m pytest tests/ --tb=short -q
# or, where the plugin has a Makefile target:
make -C plugins/<plugin> test

# Everything (what `make test` at root does)
./scripts/run-plugin-tests.sh --all

# Only plugins with staged changes
./scripts/run-plugin-tests.sh --changed

# Mutation testing for one plugin, locally
cd plugins/<plugin>
uv run mutmut run --paths-to-mutate=scripts/,src/ --tests-dir=tests/

Markers

Root pytest runs with --strict-markers, so only registered markers

are legal. Registered in root pyproject.toml: unit, integration,

e2e, slow, network, plugin, skill, hook, command, bdd,

benchmark (skip benchmarks in CI with -m "not benchmark").

Checklist for new code

  • [ ] Failing test written and observed RED before implementation

(Iron Law).

  • [ ] Test would fail if the fix were reverted (revert-test standard).
  • [ ] Correct marker applied and test placed in unit/ or

integration/ accordingly.

  • [ ] Plugin suite passes locally with its coverage flag:

uv run python -m pytest tests/ --cov-fail-under=<threshold>.

  • [ ] New skill files have a test_skill_<name>.py structural test.

Failure-mode detection: silent failure in scanners

The most recurrent bug class in this repo is the swallowed error. In

scanner-shaped code (anything that walks files and reports findings),

the signature is except-continue: a try/except that skips a file on

malformed input and reports success on the remainder. The scanner

looks healthy while ignoring exactly the inputs most likely to be

broken.

The house convention since commit 666171c3 (issue #575): a scanner

that cannot process an input emits an ADVISORY finding for it instead

of skipping silently. Examples from that commit:

  • check_hook_modernization.py emits findings on malformed

hooks.json, SyntaxError, or OSError instead of dropping the file.

  • pensive harden/scanner.py appends an ADVISORY finding for

unreadable files under --strict.

  • minister dora_metrics warns and sets a partial flag on malformed

tag lines instead of silently classifying the repo Elite.

When reviewing or writing scanner code, grep for the pattern:

rg -n "except .*:\s*$" -A2 plugins/<p>/scripts/ | rg -B1 "continue|pass"

Any hit that discards an error without emitting a finding or an inline

"why it is safe to discard" comment violates Constitution rule 10

(errors are not optional).

When NOT to use

  • Running the suites, lint, release, or publish mechanics: use

night-market-operations (command anatomy lives there).

  • Classifying and gating a change, PR review flow, non-negotiables:

use night-market-change-control.

  • A test is failing and you need triage for a known repo failure mode:

use night-market-debugging-playbook.

  • History of why a guard exists (incident narratives, reverts): use

night-market-failure-archaeology.

  • Setting up pytest config or fixtures for a new plugin:

Skill(leyline:pytest-config) has the templates, and

Skill(leyline:testing-quality-standards) the anti-pattern catalog.

Exit Criteria

  • [ ] Any completion claim made under this skill cites numbered

evidence ([E1]...) with commands and captured output, and carries

a COMPLETE, PARTIAL, or BLOCKED status.

  • [ ] Every new test added in the session fails when its guarded fix

is reverted (demonstrated, not assumed).

  • [ ] New plugin Python code landed with a test observed failing

first, and the plugin suite passes at or above its

[tool.nightmarket] coverage_threshold.

  • [ ] Any new skill file has a passing test_skill_<name>.py

structural test.

  • [ ] No scanner code added or reviewed in the session contains an

except-continue that drops input without an ADVISORY finding or a

stated reason.

Provenance and maintenance

Compiled 2026-07-02 against repo v1.9.15, branch

discussions-fix-1.9.14. Volatile facts and how to re-verify them:

  • Root coverage floor: rg -n "fail_under" pyproject.toml

(85 as of 2026-07-02).

  • Per-plugin thresholds:

rg -n "coverage_threshold" plugins/*/pyproject.toml

(90 everywhere except gauntlet at 85, as of 2026-07-02).

  • Threshold parser behavior: read the awk block in

scripts/run-plugin-tests.sh (search tool.nightmarket).

  • Mutation cadence and plugin list:

rg -n "cron|matrix" .github/workflows/mutation-testing.yml.

  • Quality gate numbers: cat .claude/quality_gates.json.
  • Golden guards still present:

`ls plugins/leyline/tests/test_python39_compat.py

plugins/gauntlet/tests/unit/test_challenges.py

plugins/herald/tests/unit/test_double_shot_latte.py

plugins/abstract/tests/hooks/test_hook_io.py`.

  • Cited commits: git log --oneline -1 <hash> for 29081fda,

a94240e2, f1cbbcf1, 30e58586, 42f7ce84, 666171c3,

268cff89.

  • Marker list: rg -n -A12 "^markers" pyproject.toml.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take athola/night-market-validation-and-qa from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.