asgard-ai-platform/biz-stp
Apply STP (Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning) framework for market strategy. Use this skill when the user needs to define target customer segments, select which segments to pursue, or craft a positioning statement — even if they say 'who is our customer', 'which market should we focus on', or 'how should we position ourselves'.
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill biz-stp
STP is the foundational marketing strategy framework: divide the market into segments (S), select which to serve (T), and define how to win in chosen segments (P). It must be done in sequence — you cannot position without first choosing a target, and you cannot target without first segmenting.
Trigger conditions:
When NOT to use:
IRON LAW: Sequential Execution — S Before T Before P
Segmentation FIRST, then Targeting, then Positioning. In that order.
Choosing a target without segmenting first means you're guessing.
Positioning without a clear target means you're positioning for everyone
(which means no one).
IRON LAW: Segments Must Be MAMS
Every segment must satisfy all four criteria:
- Measurable: You can estimate the segment's size and purchasing power
- Accessible: You can reach the segment through available channels
- Material: The segment is large enough to be profitable
- Substantial: The segment is distinct enough to respond differently to
different marketing mixes
A "segment" that fails any criterion is not actionable.
Use one or more segmentation bases:
| Base | Variables | Example |
|------|-----------|---------|
| Demographic | Age, gender, income, education, occupation, family size | "25-35 year old urban professionals earning >NT$60K/month" |
| Geographic | Country, city, climate, urban/rural, region | "Northern Taiwan metropolitan areas" |
| Psychographic | Lifestyle, values, personality, interests | "Health-conscious, willing to pay premium for organic" |
| Behavioral | Usage rate, loyalty, benefits sought, purchase occasion | "Heavy users who buy weekly, price-insensitive, value convenience" |
Combine bases for sharper segments (e.g., demographic + behavioral).
Produce 3-6 distinct segments. Fewer than 3 means you haven't segmented; more than 6 is too fragmented to act on.
Evaluate each segment on:
| Criterion | Question |
|-----------|----------|
| Size & Growth | How large is the segment? Is it growing? |
| Profitability | What margins can you achieve in this segment? |
| Competition | How many competitors serve this segment? How strong? |
| Fit | Does this segment align with your capabilities and brand? |
| Accessibility | Can you reach this segment cost-effectively? |
Choose a targeting strategy:
Craft a positioning statement using this template:
For [target segment],
[brand/product] is the [category]
that [key benefit/differentiator]
because [reason to believe].
Then validate positioning against three tests:
Plot brands on a 2D map using the two most important attributes for the target segment. This visualizes competitive positioning and identifies gaps.
# STP Analysis: {Product/Brand}
## Segmentation
| Segment | Profile | Size | Growth | Key Need |
|---------|---------|------|--------|----------|
| Seg A | {description} | {$X / N people} | {X%} | {primary need} |
| Seg B | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| Seg C | ... | ... | ... | ... |
## Targeting
| Segment | Size | Profitability | Competition | Fit | Score |
|---------|------|-------------|-------------|-----|-------|
| Seg A | H/M/L | H/M/L | H/M/L | H/M/L | {total} |
**Selected target(s):** {segment(s)} — {rationale}
**Targeting strategy:** Concentrated / Differentiated
## Positioning
**Statement:**
For {target segment}, {brand} is the {category} that {benefit} because {reason to believe}.
**Validation:**
- Relevance: ✓/✗ — {evidence}
- Differentiation: ✓/✗ — {evidence}
- Credibility: ✓/✗ — {evidence}
Scenario: STP for a new plant-based protein bar in Taiwan
Segmentation (Behavioral + Demographic):
| Segment | Profile | Size | Key Need |
|---------|---------|------|----------|
| Fitness Enthusiasts | 20-35, gym-goers, track macros | ~800K in Taiwan | High protein, clean label |
| Health-Conscious Office Workers | 25-45, desk jobs, skip meals | ~1.5M | Convenient meal replacement, low sugar |
| Vegan/Vegetarian Consumers | All ages, ethical/dietary choice | ~300K | Plant-based, no animal derivatives |
Targeting: Health-Conscious Office Workers — largest segment, underserved (most protein bars target gym-goers), high accessibility via convenience stores.
Positioning: "For busy professionals who skip meals, PlantBar is the plant-based protein bar that replaces a meal in 60 seconds because each bar has 20g protein, 5g fiber, and all essential vitamins — made entirely from whole food ingredients."
What went wrong:
references/perceptual-mapping.mdreferences/framework-comparison.mdTake asgard-ai-platform/biz-stp from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.