asgard-ai-platform/biz-4p-7p
Apply the Marketing Mix (4P/7P) framework to design tactical marketing decisions across Product, Price, Place, Promotion — plus People, Process, Physical Evidence for services. Use this skill when the user needs to plan a product launch, design a go-to-market strategy, or audit their marketing mix — even if they say 'how should we price this', 'where should we sell', or 'what's our go-to-market plan'.
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill biz-4p-7p
The 4P (Product, Price, Place, Promotion) framework structures tactical marketing decisions. For services, extend to 7P by adding People, Process, and Physical Evidence. Unlike STP (strategic), the marketing mix is tactical — it answers "how do we execute?" after STP answers "for whom?"
Trigger conditions:
When NOT to use:
IRON LAW: All Ps Must Be Internally Consistent
The 4/7 Ps must reinforce each other. A luxury product (Product) at a
budget price (Price) sold in discount stores (Place) with mass-market
ads (Promotion) is contradictory. Every P must tell the same story.
Before finalizing, check: "Does the Price match the Product? Does the
Place match the Price? Does the Promotion match the Place?"
IRON LAW: Marketing Mix Follows STP
The mix must be designed FOR the target segment identified in STP.
Different segments require different mixes. A 4P designed without
a specific target segment is guesswork.
Product — What you sell
Price — What customers pay
Place — How customers get it
Promotion — How customers learn about it
People — Who delivers the service
Process — How the service is delivered
Physical Evidence — Tangible cues of service quality
# Marketing Mix: {Product/Service}
## Target Segment
{From STP — who is this mix designed for}
## 4P Analysis
### Product
- Core benefit: ...
- Key features: ...
- Differentiation: ...
### Price
- Strategy: {cost-plus / value-based / competitive / penetration / skimming}
- Price point: {$X}
- Rationale: ...
### Place
- Channels: ...
- Coverage: {intensive / selective / exclusive}
- Key channel: ...
### Promotion
- Primary channels: ...
- Key message: ...
- Budget allocation: ...
## Extended 3P (services only)
### People
...
### Process
...
### Physical Evidence
...
## Consistency Check
| P vs P | Consistent? | Notes |
|--------|------------|-------|
| Product ↔ Price | ✓/✗ | ... |
| Price ↔ Place | ✓/✗ | ... |
| Place ↔ Promotion | ✓/✗ | ... |
| Promotion ↔ Product | ✓/✗ | ... |
## Priority Actions
1. ...
2. ...
Scenario: 4P for a premium Taiwanese tea brand selling bottled tea in convenience stores
| P | Decision | Rationale |
|---|----------|-----------|
| Product | Cold-brewed single-origin oolong, 350ml glass bottle, minimalist label | Premium positioning requires premium packaging and clear differentiation from PET bottle teas |
| Price | NT$65 (vs NT$25-35 for standard bottled tea) | Value-based pricing; target segment (25-40 urban professionals) views tea as a small luxury, not a commodity |
| Place | Selective distribution — 7-ELEVEN City Café section only, not general shelf | Exclusive placement reinforces premium positioning; City Café area signals "coffee-tier quality" |
| Promotion | Instagram KOL partnerships + in-store tasting events | Target segment follows lifestyle KOLs; tasting events reduce trial barrier for premium price |
Consistency check: Premium product ✓ → Premium price ✓ → Selective placement ✓ → Aspirational promotion ✓ — All Ps tell the same story.
What went wrong:
references/pricing-strategies.mdreferences/distribution-channels.mdTake asgard-ai-platform/biz-4p-7p from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.