mcpbeat

Writing Plans

arbiterforge/codearbiter-writing-plans

The spec-to-plan bridge. Routed to by /feature once the brainstormed spec is approved, and by /sprint before execution. Decomposes the spec into 2–5 minute tasks, each carrying its exact file path(s) and a concrete verification step that maps to a tdd obligation. Writes the plan to .codearbiter/plans/<slug>.md, ordered with dependencies flagged and an MVP slice identifiable. Nothing executes until every task has a path and a verification and the task set covers every acceptance criterion.

3k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
2
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
138
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/arbiterForge/codeArbiter --skill writing-plans

The instruction itself

8 sections, as written by the author

writing-plans

Turn an approved spec into an executable plan. Routed to by /feature (after spec approval) and /sprint.

Pre-flight

Read these, or STOP and surface the gap — never plan against an unapproved or missing spec:

  • <project-root>/.codearbiter/specs/<slug>.md — the approved brainstorming spec. The single source of acceptance criteria. Absent or unapproved → STOP and route back to /feature.
  • <project-root>/.codearbiter/CONTEXT.md — the stage: frontmatter (the maturity value) and project context.
  • <project-root>/.codearbiter/tech-stack.md — file layout, build/test/lint invocations. A verification step cites a real command from here, never a guess.
  • <project-root>/.codearbiter/coding-standards.md — structure and naming, so a task names the right path.

If --farm was requested: check that FARM_API_KEY is set in the environment (or .env at ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tools/.env). If absent, BLOCK immediately — cite ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/includes/farm.md for setup instructions. Do not proceed; the farm dispatcher cannot run without an API key. Model selection happens later (at dispatch time in subagent-driven-development), so no model research is needed here.

Phase 1 — Criterion extraction · gate: BLOCK

Lift every acceptance criterion from the spec verbatim and assign each a stable ID (AC-01,

AC-02, …). This list is the coverage ledger for the whole plan — Phase 4 checks the task set

against it.

A criterion the spec leaves ambiguous is a [CONFIRM-NN] against

<project-root>/.codearbiter/open-questions.md — surface it, do not invent the intent.

Gate: every acceptance criterion in the spec captured as a numbered AC-NN. A partial ledger does

not pass.

Phase 2 — Task decomposition · gate: BLOCK

Break the work into the smallest honest units. Each task is ~2–5 minutes of work and carries:

  • idT-01, T-02, … stable.
  • path(s) — the exact file(s) the task touches, resolved against coding-standards.md. "Some files" is not a path.
  • verification — one concrete command or observable that proves the task done (e.g., <test cmd> -k test_token_expiry passes, endpoint returns 401 on missing header). It cites a real tech-stack.md invocation or a directly observable behavior — never "looks right".
  • maps-to — the tdd obligation this verification corresponds to. The verification *maps to* a tdd obligation; it does NOT replace tdd's own gates. tdd Phase 1 still derives and Phase 4 still verifies obligations against passing tests.
  • covers — the AC-NN(s) this task advances.

Split anything that won't fit ~5 minutes or touches unrelated paths. Reject the trap of one

monolithic "implement the feature" task — that defeats the plan.

Gate: every task has at least one path AND a verification AND a maps-to. A task missing any of the

three blocks the plan.

Phase 3 — Order & MVP slice · gate: BLOCK

Order tasks so each runs only after what it depends on. Flag every dependency explicitly

(T-07 depends on T-03). A cycle is a decomposition error — return to Phase 2 and split.

Group the ordered tasks so the MVP slice is identifiable: the minimal contiguous task set that

satisfies the spec's core acceptance criteria and is shippable on its own. Everything past the slice

is incremental.

Gate: a complete dependency order with no cycle, and an explicitly marked MVP slice.

Phase 4 — Coverage proof & write · gate: BLOCK

Cross the ledger against the task set, both directions:

  • Every AC-NN is covered by at least one task's covers. An uncovered criterion blocks — author the missing task.
  • Every task advances at least one AC-NN. A task that covers nothing is scope creep — cut it or surface it.

Then write the plan to <project-root>/.codearbiter/plans/<slug>.md<slug> matching the

spec — with the AC-NN ledger, the ordered task table (id · path(s) · verification · maps-to ·

covers · depends-on · status, initialized PENDING), the marked MVP slice, and any out-of-scope

item tagged inline [NEEDS-TRIAGE].

The status column is the pipeline's resume ledger: subagent-driven-development flips a task to

ACCEPTED the moment it accepts it, so an interrupted run (crash, compaction, closed session) is

re-entered by /feature at the first non-ACCEPTED task instead of restarted from brainstorming.

Gate: bijective coverage proven — no criterion without a task, no task without a criterion — and the

plan written to disk. This clears the path to execution: executing-plans (checkpointed, via

/feature) or subagent-driven-development (autonomous, via /sprint) — each routes every task

through tdd. The plan never hands off to tdd directly.

Phase 4-farm extension (only when --farm was requested)

When --farm was requested, after the bijective coverage gate passes and the .md plan is written,

produce the farm artifact (plan.json) — one MVP slice at a time — per

${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/routines/writing-plans/references/farm-plan.md. Load that leaf and follow it;

it owns the per-task failing-test + schema-valid plan.json procedure.

Gate: all failing tests written and confirmed failing; plan.json written and schema-valid. Both

artifacts exist before handing off to subagent-driven-development.

Hard rules

  • MUST NOT plan against an absent or unapproved spec — STOP and route back to /feature.
  • MUST NOT emit a task without an exact path AND a concrete verification step.
  • MUST NOT let a task's verification stand in for a tdd gate — it maps to a tdd obligation, it does not replace one.
  • MUST NOT write the plan while any acceptance criterion is uncovered or any task covers nothing.
  • MUST NOT guess a verification command — cite tech-stack.md or STOP.
  • MUST NOT resolve an ambiguous criterion by guessing — raise a [CONFIRM-NN].
  • MUST NOT emit plan.json in --farm mode without writing and confirming each failing test first.
  • MUST NOT set meta.model or meta.apiBaseUrl in plan.json — these belong to the dispatch step.
  • MUST NOT proceed with --farm if FARM_API_KEY is absent — cite ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/includes/farm.md and BLOCK.
  • MUST, at exit, run the follow-up harvest (${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/includes/harvest.md) over any [NEEDS-TRIAGE] out-of-scope items — batch-confirm promoting them to open-tasks.md (work) or open-questions.md (decisions) so they don't die in the plan file.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take arbiterforge/codearbiter-writing-plans from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.