mcpbeat

Executing Plans

arbiterforge/codearbiter-ca-executing-plans

The checkpoint coordinator for /feature. Routed to by /feature once a writing-plans plan exists. Groups tasks into batches, delegates each batch to subagent-driven-development (fresh author agent per task, full review chain, fresh verification), then stops for a human checkpoint before the next batch. The checkpointed counterpart to /sprint's autonomous run.

1k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
138
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/arbiterForge/codeArbiter --skill executing-plans

The instruction itself

6 sections, as written by the author

executing-plans

Coordinate the plan in small, user-acknowledged batches. Routed to by /feature after

writing-plans has produced a plan. Each batch is executed by subagent-driven-development — fresh

author agent per task, spec-compliance review, quality review, fresh verification — and the user

checkpoints between batches. The orchestrator never implements; it schedules and checkpoints.

Pre-flight

Read these, or STOP and surface the gap — never guess a path, a command, or a task boundary:

  • ${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR}/.codearbiter/plans/<slug>.md — the approved plan. The ordered task list and each task's verification command are the contract. No plan, no execution.
  • ${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR}/.codearbiter/specs/<slug>.md — the spec the plan implements.
  • ${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR}/.codearbiter/CONTEXT.md — the stage: frontmatter (the maturity value) and project context.
  • ${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR}/.codearbiter/tech-stack.md — the exact verification, test, and build invocations.

Phase 1 — Batch plan · gate: BLOCK

Group the plan's tasks into small batches. Keep batches tight — three to five tasks is a ceiling, not

a target. Respect the plan's ordering and dependencies: a task never lands before the task it depends on.

Resume is the normal re-entry. A task already ACCEPTED in the plan's status column was verified

before an earlier interruption — exclude it from batching and say so ("resuming: T-01–T-03 already

ACCEPTED"). Batch only the non-ACCEPTED tasks, starting at the first. Never re-execute an ACCEPTED

task, and never restart the pipeline at brainstorming because the session died mid-plan.

For each task, confirm the plan names its exact target paths and its verification command. A task

missing either is underspecified — return it to writing-plans, do not improvise the gap.

Present the batch breakdown to the user as information, not a question: which tasks land in batch 1,

and what follows. Do NOT stop for a separate acknowledgment — the user approved the plan in

writing-plans, and the first Phase 3 checkpoint arrives after batch 1; a breakdown objection

surfaces there (or the user interrupts). Each unresolved unknown is a [CONFIRM-NN] in

open-questions.md — surface it, do not guess past it.

Gate: a batch sequence exists and every task has a target path and a verification command. A

[CONFIRM-NN] that blocks batch 1 is the only reason to stop here.

Phase 2 — Execute batch · gate: BLOCK

Invoke subagent-driven-development with scope = [current batch task IDs]. Pass the plan slug and

spec slug so it can read its own pre-flight files. Do not implement anything here — the author agents,

review chain, and verification all run inside that skill.

subagent-driven-development returns when every task in the scope is ACCEPTED (Phase 3–5 green,

verification passed on a fresh run). A tdd BLOCK, a security CRITICAL finding, or an unresolved

[CONFIRM-NN] surfaced inside that skill halts the loop — surface it to the user and do not proceed.

Gate: subagent-driven-development signals batch complete with all scoped tasks ACCEPTED. Any

unresolved halt from inside the skill is a gate failure here.

Phase 3 — Checkpoint · gate: STOP

Every task in the batch is done and verified. STOP and checkpoint with the user before any further

work:

  • Landed — the tasks completed this batch, each verified by subagent-driven-development Phase 5.
  • Next — the tasks in the upcoming batch.
  • Open — any [NEEDS-TRIAGE] marker raised inside the batch, any [CONFIRM-NN] still blocking.

Do not begin the next batch until the user acknowledges. This gate is the point of /feature — the

human checkpoint that separates it from /sprint's autonomous run.

Gate: the user has acknowledged the checkpoint. On acknowledgement, loop to Phase 2 for the next

batch. When the final batch is acknowledged and the plan is fully verified, route to commit-gate

do not commit from here.

Hard rules

  • MUST NOT execute tasks inline — delegate every batch to subagent-driven-development with an explicit scope.
  • MUST NOT advance past a checkpoint the user has not acknowledged.
  • MUST NOT call commit-gate until all batches are acknowledged and every plan task is ACCEPTED.
  • MUST surface any halt from subagent-driven-development (tdd BLOCK, CRITICAL, CONFIRM-NN) to the user — do not swallow it or re-dispatch around it.
  • MUST NOT absorb scope the plan does not name — mark it [NEEDS-TRIAGE].
  • MUST NOT commit; route to commit-gate when the plan is fully verified.
  • MUST return an underspecified task (missing path or verification command) to writing-plans — do not improvise the gap.
  • MUST surface a plan-versus-code conflict via /conflict, never silently reconcile it.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take arbiterforge/codearbiter-ca-executing-plans from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.