mcpbeat

Github Pr Best Practices

aiskillstore/github-pr-best-practices

Best practices for creating GitHub pull requests including conventional commits, PR formatting, and multi-language support (en/ja). Use when creating PRs, writing PR descriptions, or formatting commit messages.

This is a copy. The original lives at comeonoliver/github-pr-best-practices.

29k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
4
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
404
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/aiskillstore/marketplace --skill github-pr-best-practices

What comes with it

109 477 bytes besides the instruction
REFERENCE.md
resources/pr-template-examples.md
skill-report.json

The instruction itself

30 sections, as written by the author

GitHub Pull Request Best Practices

This Skill provides comprehensive guidance for creating high-quality pull requests following industry best practices and conventional commit standards.

Capabilities

  • Generate conventional commit formatted PR titles
  • Structure PR descriptions with proper sections
  • Support multiple languages (English/Japanese)
  • Follow GitHub PR template conventions
  • Avoid common PR mistakes

When to Use

Use this Skill when you need to:

  • Create a new pull request
  • Write PR titles and descriptions
  • Format commit messages
  • Follow conventional commit standards
  • Generate PR content in English or Japanese

PR Title Format

Conventional Commits Standard

PR titles must follow Conventional Commits format:

<type>(<scope>): <description>

Important: NO emojis in PR titles or descriptions.

Common Types

  • feat: New feature
  • fix: Bug fix
  • docs: Documentation changes
  • style: Code style changes (formatting, no logic change)
  • refactor: Code refactoring
  • test: Adding or updating tests
  • chore: Maintenance tasks, dependencies

The scope should indicate what part of the codebase is affected:

  • Module name: feat(auth): add OAuth2 support
  • Component name: fix(button): resolve click handler issue
  • Area of code: docs(api): update endpoint documentation

Description

  • Use imperative mood ("add" not "added" or "adds")
  • No capitalization of first letter
  • No period at the end
  • Clear and concise (under 50 characters when possible)

Examples

Good:

feat(auth): add OAuth2 authentication
fix(api): resolve timeout on large requests
docs(readme): update installation instructions
refactor(database): optimize query performance
test(auth): add integration tests for login flow
chore(deps): update dependencies to latest versions

Bad:

✨ Add new feature  (has emoji)
Fixed bug  (not following format, wrong tense)
Update.  (vague, has period)
FEAT: NEW STUFF  (all caps, vague)

PR Description Structure

Standard Template

## Summary
- Brief description of changes (1-3 bullet points)
- Focus on what and why, not how
- Keep each point concise

## Test plan
- [ ] Test case 1
- [ ] Test case 2
- [ ] Verified no regressions

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Key Principles

  • Summary Section
  • 1-3 bullet points maximum
  • Explain what changed and why
  • Avoid implementation details (those are in the code)
  • Use present tense
  • Test Plan Section
  • Use checkbox format (- [ ])
  • List specific test scenarios
  • Include regression testing
  • Be specific and actionable
  • Signature
  • Always include the Claude Code signature
  • Placed at the bottom

Detailed Explanation (When Needed)

For complex PRs, add additional sections before the signature:

## Summary
- Main changes

## Background
Context or motivation for changes

## Implementation Details
High-level overview of approach

## Test plan
- [ ] Tests

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Multi-Language Support

English (Default)

Use English when no language is specified or when language is en:

## Summary
- Add user authentication with OAuth2
- Implement token refresh mechanism
- Add comprehensive error handling

## Test plan
- [ ] Test OAuth2 login flow
- [ ] Test token refresh
- [ ] Test error scenarios

Japanese

Use Japanese when language is ja:

## 概要
- OAuth2によるユーザー認証を追加
- トークンリフレッシュ機能を実装
- 包括的なエラーハンドリングを追加

## テスト計画
- [ ] OAuth2ログインフローのテスト
- [ ] トークンリフレッシュのテスト
- [ ] エラーシナリオのテスト

Language Selection Guidelines

  • Default to English if no language specified
  • Use the language specified by the caller
  • Be consistent throughout the entire PR
  • Don't mix languages within a single PR

PR Template Integration

Using Project Templates

If the project has a PR template at .github/pull_request_template.md:

  • Read the template file
  • Follow its structure exactly
  • Don't modify section headers
  • Don't add custom sections
  • Fill in all required sections (use "N/A" if not applicable)

Template Best Practices

  • Preserve section headers: Keep them exactly as in template
  • Complete all sections: Even if marking as "N/A"
  • Follow order: Maintain the template's section order
  • Don't improvise: Stick to template structure

GitHub CLI Best Practices

Creating PRs with gh

Basic command structure:

gh pr create --draft --title "feat(scope): description" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
- Changes

## Test plan
- [ ] Tests

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
EOF
)"

Important notes:

  • Use HEREDOC format for multi-line descriptions
  • Start with --draft flag for work in progress
  • Use cat <<'EOF' (with quotes) to prevent variable expansion
  • gh pr create automatically pushes the branch (no manual push needed)

Draft vs Ready

Start as draft when:

  • Work is still in progress
  • Tests are not complete
  • Need early feedback

Convert to ready when:

gh pr ready <PR-NUMBER>

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Manual Push Before PR Creation
  • git push -u origin branch && gh pr create
  • gh pr create (handles push automatically)
  • Including Emojis
  • ✨ feat: add new feature
  • feat: add new feature
  • Incorrect Conventional Commit Format
  • Add new feature
  • feat: add new feature
  • Vague Descriptions
  • ## Summary\n- Updated stuff
  • ## Summary\n- Add OAuth2 authentication support
  • Ignoring Language Argument
  • ❌ Always using English
  • ✅ Using specified language (en/ja)
  • Modifying Template Structure
  • ❌ Adding custom sections to template
  • ✅ Following template structure exactly

Analyzing Commits for PR

Use All Commits, Not Just Latest

When creating a PR, analyze ALL commits from the merge base:

# Get merge base
MERGE_BASE=$(git merge-base origin/main HEAD)

# Get ALL commits from merge base
git log $MERGE_BASE..HEAD

Why this matters:

  • PR should represent all work on the branch
  • Latest commit might not capture full scope
  • Users expect PR to reflect entire branch

Extracting PR Content from Commits

# Get commit messages for summary
git log --format="- %s" $MERGE_BASE..HEAD

# Get changed files for context
git diff --name-only $MERGE_BASE..HEAD

# Get commit count
git log --oneline $MERGE_BASE..HEAD | wc -l

Quality Checklist

Before creating a PR, verify:

  • [ ] Title follows conventional commit format
  • [ ] No emojis in title or description
  • [ ] Summary is clear and concise (1-3 points)
  • [ ] Test plan is specific and actionable
  • [ ] Language matches specified preference
  • [ ] Template structure is followed (if exists)
  • [ ] All commits are analyzed (not just latest)
  • [ ] Claude Code signature is included
  • git-analysis: Use to gather commit and branch information
  • Project-specific templates: Check .github/pull_request_template.md

Additional Resources

See REFERENCE.md for:

  • Detailed conventional commits specification
  • Language-specific examples
  • Advanced PR patterns
  • GitHub CLI command reference

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take aiskillstore/github-pr-best-practices from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.