mcpbeat

Llmse MCP Server

ai.llmse/mcp
answering

Llmse is answering right now. Last checked 14 min ago. It exposes 10 tools.

Public MCP server for the LLM Search Engine

Uptime history 39 hours of history · worst hour 75%
39 hours agonow
100.0%
Uptime 24h
91 of 91 checks
10
Tools
read from the server
483 ms
Response time
average over 24h
open, no key
Access
streamable-http

Connect this server

Endpoint below is the one we actually reach during checks — not the one copied from a README. Last verified 14 min ago.

run in your terminal
claude mcp add mcp --transport http https://llmse.ai/mcp
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp": {
      "url": "https://llmse.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}
~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.mcp]
url = "https://llmse.ai/mcp"
.cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp": {
      "url": "https://llmse.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}
.vscode/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp": {
      "url": "https://llmse.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Available tools 10

Read directly from the server with tools/list, grouped by what they act on. If a tool disappears, we record the date.

analyze
analyze_aeo
Analyze how well content is optimized for AI answer engines. Evaluates content for AI answer engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude). Combines Q&A pattern detection, snippet extractability, and entity clarity analysis with a full Citation Readiness assessment. AEO Scoring Framework (100 points): - Answer Format Detection: 30 points (Q&A extractability patterns) - FAQ Schema Presence: 20 points (FAQPage schema markup) - HowTo Schema Presence: 15 points (HowTo schema markup) - Direct Answer Snippets: 20 points (short extractable blocks <50 words) - Entity Clarity Score: 15 points (clear entity definitions) Neutral Schema Scoring: If no FAQ/HowTo-style content detected, those schema metrics score full points rather than penalizing. Grade Scale: A (85-100), B (70-84), C (55-69), D (40-54), F (0-39) Results are cached for fast subsequent lookups. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain. Args: url: The website URL to analyze (e.g., "https://example.com"). Returns: AEO analysis with: - url: The analyzed URL - aeo_score: Overall AEO score (0-100) - aeo_grade: Letter grade (A-F) - aeo_metrics: Individual metric scores - citation: Full Citation Readiness analysis (score, grade, issues, signals) - issues: Problems detected (critical, warnings, info) - signals: Positive signals detected - recommendations: Prioritized improvements - cached: Whether result was from cache
analyze_eeat
Analyze a website URL for E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Evaluates content quality signals based on Google's Search Quality Rater Guidelines and "Creating helpful content" documentation. Detects EEAT signals including: - Experience: First-person language, case studies, testimonials, years of experience - Expertise: Author credentials, certifications, professional memberships, topic depth - Authoritativeness: Organization schema, awards, trust badges, media mentions - Trustworthiness: HTTPS, contact info, privacy policy, source citations Also detects YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) content for health, financial, and legal topics. Results are cached for fast subsequent lookups. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain. Args: url: The website URL to analyze (e.g., "https://example.com"). Returns: EEAT analysis result with: - url: The analyzed URL - score: Overall EEAT score (0-100) - grade: Letter grade (A-F) - scores: Individual category scores (experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness) - issues: Categorized issues (critical, warnings, info) - signals: Detected EEAT signals - meta: Extracted meta information - recommendations: Prioritized list of improvements - cached: Whether result was from cache
analyze_garm
Compute GARM brand safety score for a website or category. Based on the GARM (Global Alliance for Responsible Media) Brand Suitability Framework. Maps content categories to 11 GARM sensitive content categories with risk levels (Floor, High, Medium, Low). Can either: 1. Provide a URL - classification will be fetched and mapped to GARM 2. Provide category and sentiment directly for instant scoring Score interpretation: higher = safer for advertising. Floor categories (e.g., Adult) always score 0/F regardless of sentiment. Args: category: LLMSE category (e.g., "Adult", "Politics", "Sports"). sentiment: Content sentiment ("Bad", "Neutral", "Good"). url: Optional URL to analyze (fetches classification from cache). Returns: GARM brand safety analysis with: - score: Brand safety score (0-100, higher = safer) - grade: Letter grade (A-F) - garm_category: Matched GARM category name or None - risk_level: "floor"|"high"|"medium"|"low"|"none" - is_floor: True if not suitable for any advertising - issues: Categorized issues {critical, warnings, info} - recommendations: Improvement suggestions
analyze_readability
Analyze a website URL for content readability using Flesch Reading Ease. Extracts plain text from HTML and computes readability metrics including Flesch Reading Ease score, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, reading time, and word/sentence statistics. Grade Scale (web-optimized): - A (60-100): Easy, 6th-8th grade — ideal for web content - B (50-59): Fairly easy, some high school - C (30-49): Standard, college level - D (10-29): Difficult, graduate level - F (0-9): Very difficult, professional/academic Results are cached for fast subsequent lookups. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain. Args: url: The website URL to analyze (e.g., "https://example.com"). Returns: Readability analysis with: - url: The analyzed URL - score: Flesch Reading Ease score (0-100, higher = easier) - grade: Letter grade (A-F) - flesch_kincaid_grade_level: US school grade level equivalent - reading_time_minutes: Estimated reading time in minutes - word_count: Total word count - sentence_count: Total sentence count - difficult_words: Count of difficult/uncommon words - cached: Whether result was from cache
analyze_seo
Analyze a website URL for SEO optimizations. Fetches the URL content and analyzes HTML for possible SEO improvements. Results are cached for fast subsequent lookups. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain. Args: url: The website URL to analyze (e.g., "https://example.com"). Returns: SEO analysis result with: - url: The analyzed URL - score: Overall SEO score (0-100) - grade: Letter grade (A-F) - issues: List of SEO issues found (critical, warnings, info) - meta: Extracted meta information (title, description, headings, etc.) - recommendations: Prioritized list of improvements - cached: Whether result was from cache
analyze_wcag
Analyze a website URL for WCAG 2.1 Level A accessibility issues. Automated static HTML analysis covering approximately 30-40% of WCAG 2.1 Level A criteria. Checks include: image alt text, form labels, heading hierarchy, page title, html lang, empty links/buttons, ARIA labels, duplicate IDs, skip navigation, table headers, landmarks, viewport zoom, autoplay media, and tabindex ordering. Manual testing is required for full WCAG compliance assessment. Results are cached for fast subsequent lookups. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain. Args: url: The website URL to analyze (e.g., "https://example.com"). Returns: WCAG analysis with: - url: The analyzed URL - score: Accessibility score (0-100) - grade: Letter grade (A-F) - issues: Categorized issues (critical, warnings, info) - meta: Extracted accessibility metadata - recommendations: Prioritized improvements - coverage_note: Disclaimer about automated coverage - cached: Whether result was from cache
audit
audit
Perform comprehensive audit of a website URL. Fetches the URL content ONCE and provides a combined report with: - Classification: category, subcategory, language, sentiment, demographics - SEO Analysis: score, grade, issues, recommendations - EEAT Analysis: experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness scores - AEO Analysis: AI answer engine optimization score, metrics, issues, signals (includes full Citation Readiness analysis in the nested 'citation' key) - Advertiser Matching: best-fit advertising networks with scores - Similar Sites: competitor/related sites from the same category This is more efficient than calling classify_url, analyze_seo, analyze_eeat, analyze_aeo, select_advertiser, and find_similar_sites separately as it only fetches the page once. Args: url: The website URL to audit (e.g., "https://example.com"). Returns: Comprehensive audit report with: - url: The analyzed URL - classification: Category, subcategory, language, sentiment, demographics - seo: Score, grade, issues, recommendations - eeat: EEAT score, grade, category scores, issues, signals - aeo: AEO score, grade, metrics, issues, signals (includes citation results) - advertisers: Matched advertising networks with scores - similar_sites: Related sites from the same category (up to 10) - cached: Whether result was from cache
classify
classify_url
Classify a website URL into category, subcategory, language, and sentiment. Fetches the URL content and uses AI for classification. Results are cached for fast subsequent lookups. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain. Args: url: The website URL to classify (e.g., "https://example.com"). Returns: Classification result with: - url: The normalized URL - category: Main category (e.g., "Sports", "Technology") - subcategory: Specific subcategory - language: Detected content language - sentiment: Content sentiment (Good/Neutral/Bad) - age: Target age group (if available) - gender: Target gender (if available) - cached: Whether result was from cache
select
select_advertiser
Select the best advertisers based on website demographics. Matches advertisers to website content based on classification demographics. Provide either a URL (classification will be fetched) or demographics directly. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain when using URL. Scoring weights: - Category match: +10 points - Age match: +5 points - Gender match: +3 points - Sentiment match: +2 points - Higher CPM bid as tiebreaker Args: url: URL to match advertisers for (fetches classification from cache). category: Target category (e.g., "Sports", "Automotive"). subcategory: Target subcategory. age: Target age group (e.g., "18-24", "25-34", "31-51"). gender: Target gender ("male", "female", or "all"). sentiment: Content sentiment ("Good", "Neutral", or "Bad"). limit: Number of advertisers to return (1-10, default 3). min_cpm: Minimum CPM cost filter (e.g., 5.0 for $5+ CPM). max_cpm: Maximum CPM cost filter (e.g., 10.0 for $10 or less CPM). Returns: Dictionary with: - matches: List of matched advertisers with scores - match_count: Number of matches found - classification: URL classification (if URL provided) - demographics: Provided demographics (if no URL)
similar
find_similar_sites
Find similar or competitor websites based on classification. Takes a URL, classifies it (or uses cached classification), and returns other websites from the same category and subcategory. Useful for competitive analysis and discovering related content. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain. Args: url: The website URL to find similar sites for. limit: Maximum number of similar sites to return (1-50, default 10). Returns: Dictionary with: - url: The input URL (normalized) - classification: The URL's category and subcategory - similar_sites: List of similar URLs from the same category - total_in_category: Total sites in this category/subcategory - cached: Whether the classification was from cache

Endpoints

URLTransportStateLatencyChecked
https://llmse.ai/mcp streamable-http answering 486 ms 14 min ago

Llmse — questions

Answers built from our own checks of this server.

What can Llmse do?
It exposes 10 tools, read directly from the server on our last check. Among them: analyze_aeo, analyze_eeat, analyze_garm, analyze_readability, analyze_seo, analyze_wcag and 4 more. The full list with descriptions is on this page — we take it from the server itself via tools/list, not from a README. How MCP servers expose tools in the first place →
Is Llmse working right now?
We send a real MCP handshake every 15 minutes. Over the last 24 hours 91 of 91 checks got a reply (100.0%), average response time 483 ms. The bar chart above shows every period we have measured.
How do I connect Llmse?
Copy the ready config from this page — we generate it for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, Cursor and VS Code, each with the file path that client actually reads. It is a remote server, so there is nothing to install — the client connects to the address.
Does Llmse need an API key?
No. Llmse completed a full MCP handshake with us as an anonymous client and listed its tools without asking for anything. All 10 of them are readable on this page. This is what we observed, not what the docs claim.
How fast is Llmse?
It answers our handshake in 483 ms on average, which is faster than 24% of all working MCP servers we measure. That is on the slow side — worth knowing if the tool sits inside an interactive loop. The comparison comes from our own checks across the whole registry, every 15 minutes.