mcpbeat

OhMyWind MCP Server

fr.ohmywind/sailing-planner
answering

OhMyWind is answering right now. Last checked 11 min ago. It exposes 4 tools. Last commit 2 Aug 2026.

Sailing passage planner for any coast, with high-precision tides on the French Atlantic.

Uptime history 41 hours of history
41 hours agonow
100.0%
Uptime 24h
91 of 91 checks
4
Tools
read from the server
458 ms
Response time
average over 24h
5
Stars
last commit 2 Aug 2026

Connect this server

Endpoint below is the one we actually reach during checks — not the one copied from a README. Last verified 11 min ago.

run in your terminal
claude mcp add sailing-planner --transport http https://mcp.ohmywind.fr/mcp
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sailing-planner": {
      "url": "https://mcp.ohmywind.fr/mcp"
    }
  }
}
~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.sailing-planner]
url = "https://mcp.ohmywind.fr/mcp"
.cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sailing-planner": {
      "url": "https://mcp.ohmywind.fr/mcp"
    }
  }
}
.vscode/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sailing-planner": {
      "url": "https://mcp.ohmywind.fr/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Available tools 4

Read directly from the server with tools/list, grouped by what they act on. If a tool disappears, we record the date.

boat
list_boat_archetypes
List the 7 boat archetypes with descriptive metadata. The LLM (or user) maps a commercial model (e.g. "Sun Odyssey 32") to one of these archetypes from the metadata — there is no server-side mapping.
marine
get_marine_forecast
Fetch wind (and sea, when available) for a point and time window. Args: lat: latitude in degrees. lon: longitude in degrees. start: ISO-8601 datetime, timezone-aware (e.g. "2026-05-01T06:00:00+00:00"). end: ISO-8601 datetime, timezone-aware. models: optional list of model names; defaults to AROME for the Med. Note: the first request after inactivity may incur ~5s of cold-start.
plan
plan_passage
Plan an A→B passage. Compare departure windows by default; pin a single departure only when the user gives an explicit time. ## Tool routing — read this first Before calling, classify the user's question: 1. **Pure weather lookup at a point** ("y aura-t-il du vent à Cassis samedi à 14h ?", "quelles vagues dimanche au cap Sicié ?") — call ``get_marine_forecast`` and answer in text. Do NOT call ``plan_passage``: there's no route to plan. 2. **Trajet question with a flexible date** ("Marseille → Porquerolles ce week-end", "demain ou après-demain", "dans les prochains jours") — call ``plan_passage`` in **compare-windows mode**: pass ``latest_departure`` (e.g. earliest+48h) and ``sweep_interval_hours`` (3 or 6 typically) so the user sees several departure scenarios side-by-side. Then pick 2-3 good ones and let the user choose. This is the **default** for trajet planning — same API cost as a single passage thanks to cache prewarm, much more value. 3. **Trajet with a precise hour pinned by the user** ("je pars demain à 8h", "départ Saturday 9am") — call ``plan_passage`` in single mode (no ``latest_departure``). Used for the final "show me the detailed plan for THIS departure" view, often after step 2. 4. **Methodology question** ("comment c'est calculé ?", "quelle efficacité par défaut ?") — call ``read_me``. Rule of thumb: if the user does NOT give an exact hour, prefer compare-windows. The widget renders one of the windows by default and the chat lets the user pick another. ## Returned payload Single mode: - ``passage``: per-segment timing report (distance_nm, duration_h, model used, segments[] with TWS/TWA/boat_speed/Hs, warnings). - ``complexity``: 1-5 difficulty score with wind/sea breakdown and a human-readable rationale. - ``openwind_url``: deep-link to ohmywind.fr/plan that renders the same passage in the standalone web app. Compare-windows mode (``latest_departure`` set): - ``mode``: ``"multi_window"``. - ``sweep``: ``earliest`` / ``latest`` / ``interval_hours`` / ``window_count``. - ``windows[]``: each entry has ``departure``, ``arrival``, ``duration_h``, ``distance_nm``, ``complexity`` (level + label + rationale), ``conditions_summary`` (tws_min/max, predominant sail angle, hs_min/max), ``warnings``, ``passage`` (full per-segment report), ``complexity_full`` (full score), ``openwind_url``. - ``meta_warnings``: top-level notes ("3 fenêtres ignorées …"). ## How it renders On hosts that support MCP Apps (Claude, Claude Desktop, ChatGPT, VS Code Copilot, Goose, Postman, MCPJam), the response is automatically accompanied by an interactive widget — the live ohmywind.fr/plan view served via the ``ui://openwind/plan-passage`` resource declared on this tool's ``_meta``. The widget reads ``openwind_url`` from the structured output and embeds the matching plan view as an iframe. On hosts without MCP Apps support (Cursor, Le Chat, terminal), present a short text summary of the result (route, ETA, complexity, warnings) and offer ``openwind_url`` as the "View full plan →" link. ## ALWAYS include the openwind_url(s) in your text reply Even when the widget renders inline, the user wants the link spelled out so they can open the full app, share it, or bookmark it. Treat this as a hard requirement, not a fallback: - **Single mode**: end your reply with a Markdown link built from the ``openwind_url`` field, e.g. ``[Voir le plan détaillé →](<openwind_url>)``. Always use that value verbatim, never a URL you compose yourself: it points at the environment this server is configured for, which is not always the production site. - **Compare-windows mode**: list 2-4 of the most relevant windows and give each its own link, e.g. ``- Sam 2 mai 09h · 11h12 · ⚡2/5 — [voir →](url)``. The user picks one from the chat, not the widget. Phrase the link with intent ("voir le plan détaillé", "ouvrir cette fenêtre dans l'app"), not just a bare URL — the user should know what clicking does. ## Args waypoints: list of ``{"lat": ..., "lon": ...}`` dicts (>=2). Caller keeps the polyline off land — add intermediate waypoints to skirt capes and peninsulas. departure: ISO-8601 datetime, timezone-aware. archetype: one of ``list_boat_archetypes()`` names. efficiency: multiplier on polar speed. ``0.85`` racing, ``0.75`` cruising (default), ``0.65`` loaded family cruising, ``0.55`` heavy seas / fouled hull. segment_length_nm: target sub-segment length. Default 10 nm balances precision vs Open-Meteo budget; drop to 5 for tight coastal work, raise to 20 for long offshore legs. model: wind model. Default ``"auto"`` tries AROME (≤48 h) → ICON-EU (≤5 d) → ECMWF IFS 0.25° (≤10 d) → GFS (≤16 d). Pass an explicit name to bypass. max_hs_m: optional max significant wave height (meters) over the route — pass it if you have a sea-state estimate from ``get_marine_forecast`` and want it factored into the score. Defaults to wind-only scoring. motor_threshold_kn: optional sail-speed floor (knots) under which the simulator switches to engine power. Must be paired with ``motor_speed_kn`` (either alone is ignored). Typical value 2 kn — sailors fire up the engine rather than crawl in light wind. Leave unset for 100% sail. Range (0, 10]. motor_speed_kn: optional speed under engine (knots) applied to segments where the sail estimate falls under ``motor_threshold_kn``. Typical 5-6 kn for a cruising boat. Range (0, 12]. ## Compare-windows mode (latest_departure set) When ``latest_departure`` is provided, the tool switches into a window-comparison call: it walks departure times from ``departure`` up to ``latest_departure`` every ``sweep_interval_hours`` (default 1 h). Returns ``{"mode": "multi_window", "sweep": {...}, "windows": [...]}`` instead of the single-passage payload. Each window contains ``departure``, ``arrival``, ``duration_h``, ``distance_nm``, ``complexity``, ``conditions_summary``, ``warnings``, and its own ``openwind_url``. ``target_eta``: optional ISO-8601 datetime. When set, only windows that arrive within ±2 h of the target are returned. If none match, all windows are returned with a ``meta_warnings`` note. ## Failure modes Raises ``ForecastHorizonError`` if the chosen model's horizon doesn't cover the passage and ``model != "auto"``. The error message names the failing model and suggests longer-range alternatives.
read
read_me
Return OhMyWind's calculation methodology as Markdown. Call this when the user asks how passage timing, complexity, or boat speed are computed (e.g. "comment c'est calculé ?", "what assumptions does the model use?", "is tacking modelled?"). The returned text covers: polar lookup, default efficiency 0.75, VMG / tacking correction, wave derate, single-pass timing, compare-windows mode semantics, Mediterranean simplifications (tides, currents), and what is intentionally NOT modelled in V1.

Endpoints

URLTransportStateLatencyChecked
https://mcp.ohmywind.fr/mcp streamable-http answering 474 ms 11 min ago

OhMyWind — questions

Answers built from our own checks of this server.

What can OhMyWind do?
It exposes 4 tools, read directly from the server on our last check. Among them: get_marine_forecast, list_boat_archetypes, plan_passage, read_me. The full list with descriptions is on this page — we take it from the server itself via tools/list, not from a README. How MCP servers expose tools in the first place →
Is OhMyWind working right now?
We send a real MCP handshake every 15 minutes. Over the last 24 hours 91 of 91 checks got a reply (100.0%), average response time 458 ms. The bar chart above shows every period we have measured.
How do I connect OhMyWind?
Copy the ready config from this page — we generate it for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, Cursor and VS Code, each with the file path that client actually reads. It is a remote server, so there is nothing to install — the client connects to the address.
Does OhMyWind need an API key?
No. OhMyWind completed a full MCP handshake with us as an anonymous client and listed its tools without asking for anything. All 4 of them are readable on this page. This is what we observed, not what the docs claim.
How fast is OhMyWind?
It answers our handshake in 458 ms on average, which is faster than 27% of all working MCP servers we measure. The comparison comes from our own checks across the whole registry, every 15 minutes.
Is OhMyWind open source?
Yes — written in Python, 5 stars on GitHub and 6 open issues. The source link is on this page, so you can read exactly what it does with your data before you connect it.